INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Iron 5.7 in 89 K5 cam questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 11:03 PM
  #1  
bww3588's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,156
Likes: 0
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default Iron 5.7 in 89 K5 cam questions

heres the run down...

89 K5 about 5000 lbs, 4x4 with a tired TBI 350

i have a 2000 5.3 with 170k miles that is in dire need of a rebuild. so its getting the following

bored with stock LS1 pistons
edelbrock vic jr intake with edelbrock 600 carb with ign box.
supporting mods, (headers, 3 inch exhaust with H-pipe dumped, good oil pump etc...)
stock 5.3 heads with LS1 valves

going in front of a 700R4

what i need is cam suggestions.

i want everything down low, as low as possible. idealy, id like peak tq at around 3500 RPM. keeping stock 6000 RPM redline. i was thinking of hitting up PatG for a custom cam, but if i can find an off the shelf cam that will suit my needs, ill start there.

of course ill be getting new lifters, and pushrods, but its going to be a daily driver, and i cant afford to put 400 bucks worth of valve springs on the 370 in the Camaro and the Blazer every 35k miles. i want a cam that will give good lope, and not eat valvesprings. if i can get 100k miles out of it, i will be happy. the truck already has 200k miles on it, but the trans and rear end has been rebuilt. i dont want millions of hp, but if i could get 350 ftlbs at 3500 RPM, i would be happy.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 03:32 PM
  #2  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, TX
Default

look at the edelbrock 2216 cam. its made for ls motors with a carb setup.

http://www.jegs.com/i/Edelbrock/350/2216/10002/-1

230/237 540/540 with a 110+4lsa, i would think it would have good tq #s, and sound
pretty damn good as well!!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 04:50 PM
  #3  
bww3588's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,156
Likes: 0
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default

id like to have a cam that i can use LS6 springs or 918's,

do you have any experience with this cam? how is it on the valvetrain?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 10:18 PM
  #4  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, TX
Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
id like to have a cam that i can use LS6 springs or 918's,

do you have any experience with this cam? how is it on the valvetrain?
from what i can tell, it should be pretty easy on the valvetrain. i would step up to PAC1218s, or even the 918s. i dont think the ramp rate is very aggresive with this cam.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 10:45 PM
  #5  
bww3588's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,156
Likes: 0
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default

i can do the 918's. thats fine. but i already have to change the PRC Xtreme duals on the camaro every 20k or so because of the cam thats in it. i just dont want to do it to both vehicles.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 11:06 PM
  #6  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, TX
Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
i can do the 918's. thats fine. but i already have to change the PRC Xtreme duals on the camaro every 20k or so because of the cam thats in it. i just dont want to do it to both vehicles.
i dont think u will have to. should be a nice setup for u!!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2010 | 11:48 PM
  #7  
bww3588's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,156
Likes: 0
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default

i hope so....i got the engine sitting in the garage. im gonna finish the 370 for the Camaro then start on the iron LS1 for the Blazer.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #8  
TrickyTransAm's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

I was told by the cam manufacturers, that the 220 or 224 cams are fairly reliable and not crazy aggressive. I would go with a 114 degree lobe separation so It's more streetable as a daily driver, plus it'll idle better in traffic.
From what I've read on here, many are happy with the 220 cam in the 5.3.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2010 | 07:23 PM
  #9  
bww3588's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,156
Likes: 0
From: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Default

well, its going to be a 5.7 when im done with it, that being said, im not sure if your talking about the TR224 or similar that is made for cars. i really want something that is going to shine down low and still have decent mid range and high end power. i dont plan on revving it past stock rev limit (6200), and its going to be a mud truck on the weekends and occasionaly maybe tow the car to the track and back. so its gotta be able to tow 5000lbs reliably.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Denali08
FORCED INDUCTION
12
Aug 9, 2015 04:34 PM
USMCvet0311
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
12
Aug 1, 2015 07:45 AM
bbowerman
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
Jul 26, 2015 10:57 PM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM
grantpo
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
1
Jul 15, 2015 12:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.