INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Dyno: 4.8 w/Vinci low lift Stg3+N20+tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 02:07 PM
  #11  
DeucesALLin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hunterbohanan23
It must be a complete slouch off the bottle.. Respectable numbers on the bottle. Now ditch the n20 for a turbo kit and make 500/500+ all the time
without the spray it will pull a coyote 5.0 from a 20 roll... *shrug*
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 02:08 PM
  #12  
DeucesALLin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
I am not sure the impact tires have on dyno readings, but I made 477 with 12lbs (P1) and 302 N/A with 33s and 4.10s on a 5.3
Id rather use your dyno!
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 02:13 PM
  #13  
arthursc2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,341
Likes: 1,517
Default

Originally Posted by DeucesALLin
without the spray it will pull a coyote 5.0 from a 20 roll... *shrug*
doubts. I have them
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 02:15 PM
  #14  
DeucesALLin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GREENSIERRA
I know all about rotating mass. The tire he runs isnt that heavy at all. My tires weigh 83lbs a tire without the rim.
at full weight that combo was 12's all day with nothing but cam+springs+tune+spray ... probably have less in the whole truck than your 11.9X setup

Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 02:15 PM
  #15  
GREENSIERRA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 69
From: Canada
Default

No way that thing will pull a coyote without the bottle
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 02:19 PM
  #16  
GREENSIERRA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 69
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by DeucesALLin
at full weight that combo was 12's all day with nothing but cam+tune+spray... probably have less in the whole truck than your 11.9X setup

I failed to note the dyno is stingy and the converter wouldnt lock up- but yest your **** WAS faster than that combo was.
my truck weighs 5700lbs race weight and catchs wind like a sheet of plywood so yes most people have alot less into a setup then I do.
11.9 was on my old setup with a soft 150 tune.
not saying your truck wouldnt roll out on the bottle but off the bottle you cant tell us that thing is quick.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 02:20 PM
  #17  
DeucesALLin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by arthursc2
doubts. I have them
It wont beat one- but if I let off soon enough they will never know LOL

Anyway it wasnt to brag- purely posted the results because it was a solid move to go cam+tune for the same price of headers.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 02:30 PM
  #18  
DeucesALLin's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GREENSIERRA
my truck weighs 5700lbs race weight and catchs wind like a sheet of plywood so yes most people have alot less into a setup then I do.
11.9 was on my old setup with a soft 150 tune.
not saying your truck wouldnt roll out on the bottle but off the bottle you cant tell us that thing is quick.
I just shared it because for the price of headers (cam+ls6 springs+tune) alone I got probably 275rwp (trans wouldnt lockup on that pull) on THAT dyno. 275rwp in a 4300lb truck with 4.56's and 28" tires was no slouch NA

Ill post some NA times for yall when my slicks get mounted.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 05:45 PM
  #19  
arthursc2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,341
Likes: 1,517
Default

I'm curious to see this. You must live in Death Valley or have a helluva tuner because up here at 5500' above sea level, I see FBO 5.3 swapped Fox bodies run 12s

So for you to be down ~100hp and up 12-1500lbs and running 12s, that's pretty awesome
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2019 | 06:47 PM
  #20  
ZO6Ted's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 265
From: Arlington, TX
Default

I'm thinking on the bottle he'd have no problem beating me with the pwr to weight ratio and off the bottle probably a ~ 14.0. Based on 275 & 398 hp @ 4300 with 4.56's.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sierra69
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
35
Apr 28, 2011 09:42 AM
sierra69
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
May 19, 2010 05:49 PM
black4.8
Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
11
Feb 16, 2009 12:49 PM
sickREDsierra
Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
23
Mar 29, 2008 01:13 PM
CRAZYCUTER4.8
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
36
Jan 4, 2005 08:42 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.