Comp 265 High Lift cam???
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Was looking on some feed back with this cam for a 5.3L
I was thinking about have something similar ground for my daily driver. I wont be racing it. Was gonna use the 265 Low lift version but after ridding around In other trucks I think a little extra lift wouldnt hurt.
Stock rebuild 5.3L with stage 1.5 heads from WCCH.
I have a 4.10 posi and a 2600 stall with a new 60e waiting to go in.
I was looking to go with somthing like
212/218 575/575 ground on a 114 with 2 degrees advance built in.
Not looking for a lope and Not looking to be the fastest. more of a low to mid range Gain over stock and of course a little more out of the top end too...
Any reasonable tips or advice???
Thanks in advance
I was thinking about have something similar ground for my daily driver. I wont be racing it. Was gonna use the 265 Low lift version but after ridding around In other trucks I think a little extra lift wouldnt hurt.
Stock rebuild 5.3L with stage 1.5 heads from WCCH.
I have a 4.10 posi and a 2600 stall with a new 60e waiting to go in.
I was looking to go with somthing like
212/218 575/575 ground on a 114 with 2 degrees advance built in.
Not looking for a lope and Not looking to be the fastest. more of a low to mid range Gain over stock and of course a little more out of the top end too...
Any reasonable tips or advice???
Thanks in advance
#4
Seems like a ok cam to me too, but with your ported heads you might be better off with Comps newest line of LSR cams. Ive always like their new 215/223 .604/.610 112 LSR cam.
I run an LSR cam myself (219/235) and love it. Im running 918s with Tool Steel retainers. If you wanted duals go with the 926s with tool steel retainers.
I run an LSR cam myself (219/235) and love it. Im running 918s with Tool Steel retainers. If you wanted duals go with the 926s with tool steel retainers.
#5
I'd run the low lift version so you can get away with LS6 springs. They are way cheaper and will have better life expectancy. I would for sure wanna have a good converter with the cam. I had the low lift with a TB stall and I was terribly disappointed in the low end power.
#6
Yep, that ought to be a good stick in a 5.3. I'm running that same cam on a custom grind, (212/220, .560 lift, @ 114) in my lq9. Not too much lope after it warms up, but still noticable. Ran real strong down low and pulled hard all the way to 6500, while I was NA. It works even better since I put the tvs1900 on it.
#7
I think the low-lift is a better all around performer. It isn't just a difference in lift values, the valve events are entirely different between the two, and there's quite a few dyno graphs around that show the hi-lift version losing bottom end grunt that is so famously associated with the low-lift version. And, as was mentioned before, you can use the economical LS6 springs with the low-lift cam.
Trending Topics
#9
#10
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,597
Likes: 902
From: JunkYard
Yes I read that Thread. I already have that cam installed. I dont want to get into the specific details But lets just say I can have any cam I want.
I have PRC dual Gold springs so Lift Is not an issue. I could swap them out for the Yellow LS6 Springs But I would rather leave them alone.
I have no problem with the low lift version of that cam, I just figured I could better maximize My over all package with a little more lift. I can have any cam specs I want ground so I wanted to get something that would work well with this package in a daily driver application.
I have PRC dual Gold springs so Lift Is not an issue. I could swap them out for the Yellow LS6 Springs But I would rather leave them alone.
I have no problem with the low lift version of that cam, I just figured I could better maximize My over all package with a little more lift. I can have any cam specs I want ground so I wanted to get something that would work well with this package in a daily driver application.






