INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

Comp 206/212, Worth the effort in a 4.8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2008, 04:57 PM
  #21  
Admin
iTrader: (22)
 
03sierraslt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Western PA
Posts: 19,004
Received 216 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SlvrSierra4.8
Def haven't forgot about WCCH. I have talked to Richard regarding cam selection several times. He was extremely helpful in helping me narrow down my options and providing some great info. Big props to them, they will be who I call if I can ever get the funds together for the swap.
Richard is a good guy, Ive talked to him about cams as well. Once I decide I am calling him too.
Old 01-05-2008, 06:12 PM
  #22  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
SlvrSierra4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PappyDan
112 is nice, but the 116 works better with my supercharger.
gm does make one with the same lift on a 112 lsa,
i would suggest that one but way too many have complaned about it.
Have always heard mixed reviews on the zo6 cam. I think I will stick w/ a comp grind whatever it may be
Old 01-05-2008, 07:03 PM
  #23  
dug
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
dug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if you can get the cam and springs for free that more money for a ls6 intake
Old 01-06-2008, 02:02 PM
  #24  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
SlvrSierra4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bump......any more input?
Old 01-06-2008, 07:33 PM
  #25  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Parke10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bakersfield,Ca
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

i figured id just ask here since theres abunch of info already, im kinda confused with all these numbers being thrown around but im looking for 1 maybe 2 steps above a stock 5.3 cam id like to keep everything else stock just bring a little more power outta her and not kill the MPG doing it but from what ive see would i go with a 206/212 or a 208/212 or something different?
Old 01-06-2008, 08:43 PM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
eallanboggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You might not believe this, but I put cam from a 5.3 in a 4.8 that was in the 220 range duration and 540 lift. The customer wanted Scopion rollers and opted for the 1.8s which caused the effective lift to go to the 575 neighborhood. This truck kicks butt and the owner now thinks that everyone that pulls up beside him at a red lite is looking to race. Of course, the PCM was reflashed(TSP) since it has an auto. trans. I also installed most of the other bolt on mods, but no aftermarket heads or headers. None the less the truck hauls even thought it's N/A with no dope. I also put a Superior Super Servo in there which makes shifts more fun even if it is an auto.
Old 01-06-2008, 08:59 PM
  #27  
LS1 Tech Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Steve Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that a 206/212 or 208/212 cam with a 112 to 114 LSA and about 3 degrees advance ground in would be an excellent choice for a 4.8 Auto or Manual. You'll loose a little torque off idle but you should be fine by 1,200 RPM's and it will breathe better by 1,800 RPM's (as compared to a stock cam). Also, unless you have decent aftermarket heads, a valve lift above .520" won't help much if any.

Steve
Old 01-06-2008, 09:17 PM
  #28  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

You guys realize you can buy a used 00 fbody cam for cheap and its damn near the same thing. 205/212 .496 .496 115lsa, the 115lsa will help with the stock stall in your 4.8 and net damn near the same results as the comp cam for an 1/8th of the price
Old 01-07-2008, 09:42 AM
  #29  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
jdawg04 4.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i have the mods in my sig and the cam (212/218) definitily pulls in the Mid and up top but to me it leaves a little to be desired off the line yet I am still on the stock stall so that should clear that problem up.

I just got my truck dynoed and it did 306hp 305tq not the most power but the truck runs strong for a 4.8 on 22s
Old 01-07-2008, 11:28 AM
  #30  
Tribe Shaman
iTrader: (4)
 
PappyDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Bryant
I think that a 206/212 or 208/212 cam with a 112 to 114 LSA and about 3 degrees advance ground in would be an excellent choice for a 4.8 Auto or Manual. You'll loose a little torque off idle but you should be fine by 1,200 RPM's and it will breathe better by 1,800 RPM's (as compared to a stock cam). Also, unless you have decent aftermarket heads, a valve lift above .520" won't help much if any.

Steve

you need to check out the flow charts posted on the site.
the 4.8/5.3 heads flow best with a cam at around 550 lift.


Quick Reply: Comp 206/212, Worth the effort in a 4.8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.