what do ya'll think about a comp cam 224 224 .579 on a 114.my brother inlaw has one that never installed on his truck and has about 2,000 miles minimum.

 

good cam as well, just wont sound as choppy as the 112lsa....

 

For an ECSB, I would go with not much larger than a 222 on the exhaust duration unless you have some serious work done other than basic bolt-ons. If it's gonna be used as a daily driver, I'd say the max would be a 218/222 .563/.566, and I wouldn't run anything more than a 112lsa simply because the lower LSA will bring your torque in faster. If you went with that cam, you would definately need 4.10's. You could get away with it on the stock stall, but would make more power with AT LEAST a TB stall.

 

ap you think a cam like the one i said but with the 112lsa?with like a yank 3000?and run the 3.73's for a little bit and catch up on some 4.10's later.

 

Doubtful edgar. the yank3000 is a tight converter. yank3000 and the 220/220 with 3.73's would be better. These two cams at 6000rpm might make 10 rwhp different at the most. But the 220/220 will bring the hp and torque down int he rpms about 500.

 

Go with the tsp 220/581 that ap recomended on a 112 lsa.

 

alrightee!!!

 

gohete and buy it

 

If you're not gonna put the cam and stall in at the same time, get the stall first...

 

glad that you finally made up your mind.... so you are planning on a yank3000? if you decide to go with a fuddle, I'll give you the specs on mine, same converter I had with the 5.3