ARP/Katech connecting rod bolts...
#21
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sittin on jackstands
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by RoninsDenali
That yellowish stuff on the block, looks like you had to discharge a dry-chem fire exhtinguisher on that thing...
Yep I gues oil and hot iron dont mix too well
#22
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sittin on jackstands
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by trever1t
That had to hurt. How high were you spinning it when it detonated? I asked Rick about doing rod bolts on my set up with the Radix and he said it wasn't necessary.
Man that sucks.
Man that sucks.
6400 I think maybe a little less. My rev limiter was at 6200 or 6400, it hit once, or twice, then BOOM
#24
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lake Conroe Texas
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I haven't found anybody's bad experience from directly replacing ARP's in my research, but obviously there's a reason for them notifying you of that when you go to purchase, right?
#25
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
on cracked rods like ours theres no reason for machining. maybe for the old school sbc's. think about it both bolt squeeze better and are stronger but yet one needs machined and the other don't i don't think so . i went with arp's. Oh, and how much power did parish make with arp's? nuff said.
#26
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, if it is any consolation, every single ASA LS1 engine had these bolts in them, and there were some engines that ran all four seasons without any problems. These bolts are the same exact weight as the stock ones, so they don't offset the balance. They also have the stepped shoulders to positively position in the rod.
There may be absolutly nothing wrong with the ARP's, but my money is on the Katech bolts. They were designed to be an exact replacement, so why mess with a good thing.
There may be absolutly nothing wrong with the ARP's, but my money is on the Katech bolts. They were designed to be an exact replacement, so why mess with a good thing.
#27
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (28)
Originally Posted by MSURacing
Well, if it is any consolation, every single ASA LS1 engine had these bolts in them, and there were some engines that ran all four seasons without any problems. These bolts are the same exact weight as the stock ones, so they don't offset the balance. They also have the stepped shoulders to positively position in the rod.
There may be absolutly nothing wrong with the ARP's, but my money is on the Katech bolts. They were designed to be an exact replacement, so why mess with a good thing.
There may be absolutly nothing wrong with the ARP's, but my money is on the Katech bolts. They were designed to be an exact replacement, so why mess with a good thing.
#28
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Z06 DREAMING
are you saying the ARPs are a different weight? I thought they were the same also... but I don't know for sure.
To be honest, if they we're of different weight. I'm sure we would have heard complaints about this effecting engine balance, etc. But i havent heard a peep. So im just gonna say their the same (or close enough not to cause a issue)