INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

706s/LQ9 combo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2018, 08:40 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
000martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Bama
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default 706s/LQ9 combo

I am runnin a denali with an sbe 6L. I have another thread documenting the full build. As of now it’s cammed, longtubes, stall.

I recently started gathering parts and picked up a NNbs intake complete with 32lb/hr injectors. I have two sets of 706 heads and going to swap them in at the same time the intake goes on. I have questions about some of the values needed for the static and dynamic compression calculator. If I’m doing the math right, with the smaller 61.5cc chambers of the 706s and an ls9 gasket it’s putting me @ 12.08:1 static. I’m thinkin I did some wrong math or something. Stock flat top pistons no reliefs, & a .051 gasket. Any advice would be great. Thanks

Ive spoken with Richard Holdener about the 706s on a 6L and he said they make more hp than 243/799s up til around 5k, then the 799 takes over by a slim margin. The 706s have a better torque curve though.

Old 10-03-2018, 11:08 AM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
Vortec350ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Shore, MA
Posts: 7,271
Received 61 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

12 is wrong. Your compression would be around 11.4:1

They will make for a very snappy engine thats for sure.
Old 10-03-2018, 11:44 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
000martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Bama
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vortec350ss
12 is wrong. Your compression would be around 11.4:1

They will make for a very snappy engine thats for sure.

I knew I was inputting the wrong value in the calculator somewhere. Thanks.


It’s gonna choke it a little up top but that’s what this 125 shots for.
[img]blob:https://www.performancetrucks.net/1f9c3413-b76e-49b4-8284-13e0a4071a63[/img]
Old 10-04-2018, 06:46 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
madmann26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Somewhere north of 285, south of 985.
Posts: 2,987
Received 371 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Richard is a smart guy. The point of the 706s is pointing out to people where you spend most of your time driving.

I doubt you’ll feel the difference up top.
Old 10-04-2018, 01:56 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
000martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Bama
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=madmann26;5449065]
Richard is a smart guy. The point of the 706s is pointing out to people where you spend most of your time driving.

I doubt you’ll feel the difference up top



With it being 5500lbs I want one that will get down and go down low. I figure the Awd will get me movin without spinning too much. If I lose some up top that’s fine, should be better than my 317s anyhow.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matt29201
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
10
01-02-2011 10:13 PM
454navyss
GM Parts Classifieds
11
09-23-2009 06:34 AM
joshua022
GM Parts Classifieds
17
02-28-2008 07:36 PM



Quick Reply: 706s/LQ9 combo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 AM.