INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS Valvetrain |Heads | Strokers | Design | Assembly

6.0L L92/truck intake cam ideas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #11  
OnyxSilveradoSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
Default

I am worried about stalling higher and then the intake falling off @ 6000rpm. If I can get the powerband lower in the rpms I hope that the intake wont become a restriction.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 07:40 PM
  #12  
blacksheep's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, Mississippi
Default

I promise the intake does not fall off at 6000.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #13  
Steve Bryant's Avatar
LS1 Tech Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Ks
Default

Originally Posted by supersub
Steve,
Are you running L92's int that combo??
No, like it says in my signature, I'm currently running cast iron heads that I ported myself.

A higher stall speed converter works fine if you are running a lighter vehicle primarily for strip use with a big cam that doesn't make any torque down low.

If you want to enhance the performance of a street driven vehicle, especially a heavier truck, go to a slightly bigger cam, a low restriction air intake, some good street headers and a great tune. A significantly larger cam (duration over 21X intake) even with a higher stall converter does not produce broad band torque and will never have the manners it needs to a a fun daily driver. There are many, many threads on this subject both here and at LS1Tech.com and probably other places too.

Steve
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #14  
supersub's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Bryant
No, like it says in my signature, I'm currently running cast iron heads that I ported myself.

A higher stall speed converter works fine if you are running a lighter vehicle primarily for strip use with a big cam that doesn't make any torque down low.

If you want to enhance the performance of a street driven vehicle, especially a heavier truck, go to a slightly bigger cam, a low restriction air intake, some good street headers and a great tune. A significantly larger cam (duration over 21X intake) even with a higher stall converter does not produce broad band torque and will never have the manners it needs to a a fun daily driver. There are many, many threads on this subject both here and at LS1Tech.com and probably other places too.

Steve
never discussed stall speeds 2800 in a 5400lb truck will stall higher anyways it is already stated in what joe's current set up,and i dont believe what works in your combination really relates to what was asked,the L92's are different and have been proven so at a lot of other's mistakes.
I have a current l92 combo and for my particular setup hitting 425-535 lb's@ 2500-5500 rpms and that seems to workin so far.Just conveying my thoughts since I do have and invested highly into the LS3/L92 heads.
Just my MHO
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #15  
supersub's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by OnyxSilveradoSS
I am worried about stalling higher and then the intake falling off @ 6000rpm. If I can get the powerband lower in the rpms I hope that the intake wont become a restriction.
My particular LSX L92 build up the HP peaked @6200 588hp,tq started 400+ 2500 and did not fall off until 5500 hitting 532lb's

So no worries there my friend....
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:27 PM
  #16  
05GMCL33's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
From: Wichita
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Bryant
A higher stall speed converter works fine if you are running a lighter vehicle primarily for strip use with a big cam that doesn't make any torque down low.

If you want to enhance the performance of a street driven vehicle, especially a heavier truck, go to a slightly bigger cam, a low restriction air intake, some good street headers and a great tune.
Steve
Good info Steve, I agree that with a daily driven heavy truck a bigger cam is not always better. I'm looking at doing a Comp 212/218 and keeping the stock converter for my DD but I don't tow anything.

Also want to say to my fellow PT.net member from Wichita, KS.

Last edited by 05GMCL33; Jan 28, 2008 at 09:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #17  
supersub's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,105
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by OnyxSilveradoSS
I have been looking for what would be a good cam for my 5400lbs truck? I look over @ tech and alot of people keep it a secret...so I guess throw out what I should look for since this is going in a truck.
WT=5400
gears=4.10
trans=auto
T/c=2600-2800
Intake=truck L92

This is a DD so I dont need to shift much past the 6200 where the intake seems to fall off. I am AWD. I currently have the cam in my sig, 224/224 .56ish @112...but I know the cam choice is critical so I dont lose my bottom end and plan on pulling it whan I do the heads. I have posted a few things on tech and seem to get black balled. I have heard that the smaller cam work well w/L92
L92 Spec'd somewhere around this:
207/218 615/624 on a 114 thats my guess.....Very similar have been proven with great results in our heavy trucks...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ARC
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
57
Feb 21, 2022 10:54 AM
WICK3DxGATA
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Jul 21, 2015 06:59 PM
oharajo
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
2
Jul 18, 2015 09:24 PM
fat tony157
GM Parts Classifieds
6
Jul 16, 2015 12:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 AM.