5.3L 383 Stroker Engine Build - Displacement & Replacement
#11
Couple of things. If this was going in a car, ls6 intake. If it was going in a truck, tbss intake. I don't get running an expensive intake with a FI application. Also, why do ppl get the biggest blower/turbo and run low boost? A smaller charger at that boost lvl would make more power.
#12
the vortech 2.3 looks like it comes with a 4 inch pulley, from what i see is pretty large compared to people running 3.5 inch or lower. it probably could pull 10psi easy with a smaller puller. but yea i kinda see your point, like a tvs1900 could possibly run the same boost and add more power.
now i was just looking around and i see Texas Speed & Performance offers a bottom of the line 383 rotating assembly for 1700 bucks. of course depending on power, FI, nitrous, you could customize the kit:
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=884&catid=88
EDIT: read through and they could only get 2.5psi with a 3.8inch pulley from that big s/c. they got those numbers from a 3 inch pulley. i guess there was more potential from the air/water intercooler that it offers
now i was just looking around and i see Texas Speed & Performance offers a bottom of the line 383 rotating assembly for 1700 bucks. of course depending on power, FI, nitrous, you could customize the kit:
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=884&catid=88
EDIT: read through and they could only get 2.5psi with a 3.8inch pulley from that big s/c. they got those numbers from a 3 inch pulley. i guess there was more potential from the air/water intercooler that it offers
Last edited by fortplainman; Nov 8, 2010 at 11:07 AM.
#13
All things equal wouldn't the 383 have more torque than the 6.0 due to the stroke advantage? Also slightly more displacement in the 383...6.3L vs 6.0L
Makes me wonder if the 383 would be a better towing motor than the 6.0
Makes me wonder if the 383 would be a better towing motor than the 6.0
#14
now i was just looking around and i see Texas Speed & Performance offers a bottom of the line 383 rotating assembly for 1700 bucks. of course depending on power, FI, nitrous, you could customize the kit:
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=884&catid=88
#15
Yeah I have seen the cost is cheaper to get a 6.0 and do a 408 kit. There's more info here about it but my thought is that someone (like me) who would like to keep their original motor and go about something of this nature vs getting another motor. people may tell me I'm idiotic for not wanting to go 6.0 for the price but someone looking to beef up internals for FI wanting to hit the 600HP range for a daily would go this route vs. A larger bore that would produce more HP then again you can argue the fact that this could be done with a 408 and just use less boost for less stress on internals. this is all IMO of what I see and think. I will keep reading around about forged internals for FI apps and modded 6.0 to a 408. As well as prices and kits out there or aftermarket prices. Just thought this was a cool article. Keep up with the replies its always good to hear the knowledge of the smart guys on this forum

Bottom line is plan, spend your hard earned money wisely and most of all have fun.
#17
I'm in the process of building a forged 383 based on the 5.3 iron block. I have been reading that magazine and comparing what I'm doing to what they did. I'll be using a bigger cam and slightly higher compression and mounting a 2300 on it to replace the 1900 as money allows.
Some of the advantages of a 383 over the 400+ci LQ9 engines is better fuel economy under average driving conditions and lower block cost.
Advantages of the 400+ LQ9 engines include less valve shrouding, less machining, deeper cylinder sleeve and greater power due to displacement, all other things being equal.
Personally, I'd prefer a blown 383 over a n.a. 408 because I love the blower sound and look. I also want some semblance of towing economy, and because these days the LS 383 a bit of a rarity.
Yes, the 383 would have more power and torque than a 6.0 (364), the same way a 403 would have more than a 383. Therefore it would make a better towing engine.
Some of the advantages of a 383 over the 400+ci LQ9 engines is better fuel economy under average driving conditions and lower block cost.
Advantages of the 400+ LQ9 engines include less valve shrouding, less machining, deeper cylinder sleeve and greater power due to displacement, all other things being equal.
Personally, I'd prefer a blown 383 over a n.a. 408 because I love the blower sound and look. I also want some semblance of towing economy, and because these days the LS 383 a bit of a rarity.
All things equal wouldn't the 383 have more torque than the 6.0 due to the stroke advantage? Also slightly more displacement in the 383...6.3L vs 6.0L
Makes me wonder if the 383 would be a better towing motor than the 6.0
Makes me wonder if the 383 would be a better towing motor than the 6.0
#19
Ii don't have a thread started for my build yet, as I'm accumulating parts right now. My cam just shipped yesterday and I pick the engine up next week. I'll make a thread but it'll be short and sweet. PM me if you'd like details.
#20
oh ok, i actually read for like 2 hours after i posted up through your threads on the 1.9 tvs and your 383 threads. actually i was going through calculations trying to come up with what boost you could run with a 2.3 tvs on the 383 vs. a 1.9 on the 403/383. i came up with around 14 max on a 2.8 pulley. sounds like you will have a bitchin setup ill keep tabs on it.






