GMT K2xx Trucks General Discussion 2014+ Trucks | General Discussion

2018 6.2 8 speed baseline 1/8 results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2018 | 06:15 PM
  #11  
JRoyPDX's Avatar
10 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 341
Likes: 8
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

My stock L83 5.3 in the 2017 4x4 went 9.25 @ 75mph and 14.45 @ 94mph. Best results came from 4wd launch, full throttle power brake and TC off. Then shifted to 2wd after the 1-2 shift.

Biggest difference other than motor is mine is lowered instead of lifted.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 05:20 AM
  #12  
Gorske's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 398
Likes: 11
From: St. Joseph,MI
Default

Originally Posted by JRoyPDX
My stock L83 5.3 in the 2017 4x4 went 9.25 @ 75mph and 14.45 @ 94mph. Best results came from 4wd launch, full throttle power brake and TC off. Then shifted to 2wd after the 1-2 shift.

Biggest difference other than motor is mine is lowered instead of lifted.
Hmmm that seems a little quick for stock. I know your truck is a standard cab short bed but my Z71 stock went 9.70 @ 70.46 and 15.21 @ 89.86. 93 tune only best time was 9.22 @ 75.31 and 14.40 @ 94.78. Best e85 tune only pass was 8.91 @ 77.76 and 13.96 @ 97.05. I run my truck the same way just didn't think the standard cab short bed was that much quicker than the double cab with the same size bed. That would mean with a Klug Performance 93 tune your truck would possibly be running 13.6s and 13.2s with an e85 tune... I would have to say it sounds like you got one hell of a factory freak from what I've seen the other stock 5.3 trucks run at the track where I live.

Last edited by Gorske; Oct 11, 2018 at 05:38 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 07:28 AM
  #13  
Choda's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 62
From: Buffalo NY
Default

^^^ yup the reg cab short bed makes a huge difference when comparing to my loaded Crew Cab. Gm needs to put a 6.2 4x4 in a rcsb from the factory. itd be a hot ticket.

with a Tune, catback and intake I went 8.8 at 78mph and a 13.8 at 99.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 09:44 AM
  #14  
JRoyPDX's Avatar
10 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 341
Likes: 8
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by Choda
Gm needs to put a 6.2 4x4 in a rcsb from the factory. itd be a hot ticket.
Yep if it were available that's what I would've bought.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 08:01 PM
  #15  
00pooterSS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 261
From: Dallas
Default

I've gotta get to the track soon and see how I compare.

There's a highway on ramp near my house that's probably about 1000 feet (hopefully it's closer to 800 or so ft but it's also uphill) from the stop sign to a sign near where the entrance dumps onto the highway, when my truck was stock it hit around 70 mph at that sign. Now with the tune, on e85, magnaflow and flapper delete it's hitting 85-86, that's huge so I'm hoping to get near y'alls numbers, but 2wd is gonna f me hard at the track.

Y'all all cutting 2.0-2.1 60 ft's?
(Gorske, before your blower)

Last edited by 00pooterSS; Oct 11, 2018 at 08:14 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 08:04 PM
  #16  
JRoyPDX's Avatar
10 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 341
Likes: 8
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Y'all all cutting 2.0-2.1 60 ft's?
(Gorske, before your blower)
2.0 60ft here. (1.5 in my Syclone heh)
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 08:16 PM
  #17  
00pooterSS's Avatar
TECH Junkie
15 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 261
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by JRoyPDX
2.0 60ft here. (1.5 in my Syclone heh)
Thanks. I really hope I can get a 2.0, but I really doubt it since y'all are in the 4wd trucks.

Your syclone can 6.0ft 1.5, but I can almost put it in the bed of my truck lol.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 08:19 PM
  #18  
JRoyPDX's Avatar
10 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 341
Likes: 8
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Thanks. I really hope I can get a 2.0, but I really doubt it since y'all are in the 4wd trucks.
You can probably 2.0 if launched just right.

Originally Posted by 00pooterSS
Your syclone can 6.0ft 1.5, but I can almost put it in the bed of my truck lol.
haha gotta catch me first!
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 08:30 PM
  #19  
Mark Johnson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 29
From: Santa Fe New Mexico
Default

Hmm- starting to sound like I can settle for the 5.3...……………..
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2018 | 09:05 PM
  #20  
JRoyPDX's Avatar
10 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 341
Likes: 8
From: Portland, Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by 2001 Sierra
Hmm- starting to sound like I can settle for the 5.3...……………..
Personally I don't think its settling. With bolt ons and cam and cnc heads people are making 450whp. And the forced induction stock bottom record is like over 860whp.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.