intake & tb questions
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
intake & tb questions
are the new nnbs 5.3 intakes and/or throttle bodies different from the L92s or the tbss?
is it worth putting in either a L92 or tbss intake and/or throttle body in my 5.3?
thanks in advanced
is it worth putting in either a L92 or tbss intake and/or throttle body in my 5.3?
thanks in advanced
#2
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: CAYMAN ISLANDS
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The L92 intake can't fit the 5.3. The L92 has rectangular port heads and the 5.3 has cathederal ports. From what I've read the tbss has a better intake than the 5.3 that should fit. I think the throttle bodies are the same on the L92 and the tbss (87mm). not os sure about the 5.3 though.
#3
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oww yeah thats right, the L92 is different
i thought all of the nnbs already came w the 87mm tb but wasnt 100% sure
so i guess the tbss intake is my only option
is there any proof or evidence (like a dyno comparison) that the tbss intake is better than the nnbs stock ones?
i thought all of the nnbs already came w the 87mm tb but wasnt 100% sure
so i guess the tbss intake is my only option
is there any proof or evidence (like a dyno comparison) that the tbss intake is better than the nnbs stock ones?
#5
TBSS and NNBS share the same intake+ throttle body (87MM) but with a slight port u got A 90MM / as for the L76 /L92 intake- it would NOT be a direct due 2 the rectangle head port (just like CI Denali ) said .. and 5.3 (l33,ly5,ect) have cathederal ports-
#7
yes F.A.S.T does have 102MM tb , but you also need a 102MM intake , which runs about 1K < a 5.3 with 102MM intake ( not a good idea) you need atleast a l76/l92/ls3 + a big Intake cam . . if not ur little engine is going 2 choke with that much Air..
http://www.fuelairspark.com/
http://www.fuelairspark.com/