Notices
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

Guess the saying "Like a rock".........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2012, 10:43 PM
  #21  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (36)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: somewhere in TX
Posts: 4,927
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

nope standard old bolts. I love my truck but my 98 chevy was built way better and it did go the distance.
Old 07-17-2012, 10:51 PM
  #22  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Three6GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Corpus Christi
Posts: 2,165
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gbody6liter
Here's the difference between the 3. First 2 are of my truck, next 2 are Ford and Mopar respectively.
**** the GMs look like the best ones! Dodge looks the weakest as it looks thin and flat. Ford looks like it uses thicker metal but still flat and 2 piece. The GM on looks to be the strongest because of the thickness and shape. All those dif angles add more regidity then what a flat plate would do.
Old 07-17-2012, 11:49 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Gbody6liter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South TX
Posts: 182
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Look at the actual control arm and where it attaches to the mount. GM uses nothing more than 12ga material stamped into a bucket shape. There's no reinforcement to speak of. The Ford and Mopar both have lots of metal and reinforcement around that area. You're not looking at the pictures right. There's only a small thin piece of stamped steel on either side of the control arm mount that holds it all together.
Old 07-18-2012, 12:03 AM
  #24  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
JCunningham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

wait a min they totaled it because the holes were oveled out? that could be fixed for $10 at a welding shop.
Old 07-18-2012, 12:54 AM
  #25  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,315
Received 222 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

i would love to see that ovaled bolt hole without the bolt in the way to see what actually happened. without jumping to conclusions, it is totally possible that the bolt was torqued incorrectly and it slowly weared into it's current condition. it's also possible that your wreck caused it but i see cracked metal before an actual egg shape from smacking a curb. pull that bolt and look at the bolt....if the bolt is worn down i would be that it was already like that and was found after the wreck.
Old 07-18-2012, 01:41 AM
  #26  
11 Second Hall Moniter
iTrader: (22)
 
AKlowriderZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,651
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

^^^Reminds me of a ovaled cam gear bolt hole. No?
Old 07-18-2012, 02:18 AM
  #27  
TECH Regular
 
BIGDADDY1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Louisiana-With "Swamp People"
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

I dont know how an ins adjuster filed it totaled from that ... I had my stepson pull out in front an 80s model chevy and ripped damn near my whole front end and put $14k worth of damage and state farm is like nooe its not totaled.. My body shop i dealt with had to do a 1/4 frame replacement on whole fromt cap because if ins replaced whole frome it wuda benn $15k total n then wud been a total loss ..on my 08 back at end of yr of 2010 .. Ins comp's are sum mthr frs i tell ya
Old 07-18-2012, 09:36 AM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Glaring obvious weakness? You hit a curb. The truck isn't designed to be crashed and come out unscathed. If you hit a curb, and side load the suspension components, they are all going to fail. The forces involved are just too high.

I'm not seeing a major difference between the 3 front end designs. The Dodge may "appear" beefier, but its an unboxed design, compared to the Chevy. When it is boxed, you can use thinner metal, and end up with a stronger overall structure.

My advice...Get a 6.2, avoid the curbs, and enjoy the best half ton powertrain available. I've driven them all, and nothing compares to the GM 6.2.
Old 07-18-2012, 10:14 AM
  #29  
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
 
TXsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Humble Texas
Posts: 18,315
Received 222 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AKlowriderZ71
^^^Reminds me of a ovaled cam gear bolt hole. No?
Old 07-18-2012, 11:01 AM
  #30  
Launching!
 
11Silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MyLS1Hauls
Glaring obvious weakness? You hit a curb. The truck isn't designed to be crashed and come out unscathed. If you hit a curb, and side load the suspension components, they are all going to fail. The forces involved are just too high.

I'm not seeing a major difference between the 3 front end designs. The Dodge may "appear" beefier, but its an unboxed design, compared to the Chevy. When it is boxed, you can use thinner metal, and end up with a stronger overall structure.

My advice...Get a 6.2, avoid the curbs, and enjoy the best half ton powertrain available. I've driven them all, and nothing compares to the GM 6.2.
i agree with that lol...the 6.2 owns them all. I have driven hemis and the new 5.0 f150 and they are both turds compared to my silverado. The only thing that is nice/better is the interiors on those other two trucks.


Quick Reply: Guess the saying "Like a rock".........



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.