Guess the saying "Like a rock".........
#22
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
**** the GMs look like the best ones! Dodge looks the weakest as it looks thin and flat. Ford looks like it uses thicker metal but still flat and 2 piece. The GM on looks to be the strongest because of the thickness and shape. All those dif angles add more regidity then what a flat plate would do.
#23
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Look at the actual control arm and where it attaches to the mount. GM uses nothing more than 12ga material stamped into a bucket shape. There's no reinforcement to speak of. The Ford and Mopar both have lots of metal and reinforcement around that area. You're not looking at the pictures right. There's only a small thin piece of stamped steel on either side of the control arm mount that holds it all together.
#25
Moderator
iTrader: (19)
i would love to see that ovaled bolt hole without the bolt in the way to see what actually happened. without jumping to conclusions, it is totally possible that the bolt was torqued incorrectly and it slowly weared into it's current condition. it's also possible that your wreck caused it but i see cracked metal before an actual egg shape from smacking a curb. pull that bolt and look at the bolt....if the bolt is worn down i would be that it was already like that and was found after the wreck.
#27
TECH Regular
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: South Louisiana-With "Swamp People"
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont know how an ins adjuster filed it totaled from that ... I had my stepson pull out in front an 80s model chevy and ripped damn near my whole front end and put $14k worth of damage and state farm is like nooe its not totaled.. My body shop i dealt with had to do a 1/4 frame replacement on whole fromt cap because if ins replaced whole frome it wuda benn $15k total n then wud been a total loss ..on my 08 back at end of yr of 2010 .. Ins comp's are sum mthr frs i tell ya
#28
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Glaring obvious weakness? You hit a curb. The truck isn't designed to be crashed and come out unscathed. If you hit a curb, and side load the suspension components, they are all going to fail. The forces involved are just too high.
I'm not seeing a major difference between the 3 front end designs. The Dodge may "appear" beefier, but its an unboxed design, compared to the Chevy. When it is boxed, you can use thinner metal, and end up with a stronger overall structure.
My advice...Get a 6.2, avoid the curbs, and enjoy the best half ton powertrain available. I've driven them all, and nothing compares to the GM 6.2.
I'm not seeing a major difference between the 3 front end designs. The Dodge may "appear" beefier, but its an unboxed design, compared to the Chevy. When it is boxed, you can use thinner metal, and end up with a stronger overall structure.
My advice...Get a 6.2, avoid the curbs, and enjoy the best half ton powertrain available. I've driven them all, and nothing compares to the GM 6.2.
#30
Glaring obvious weakness? You hit a curb. The truck isn't designed to be crashed and come out unscathed. If you hit a curb, and side load the suspension components, they are all going to fail. The forces involved are just too high.
I'm not seeing a major difference between the 3 front end designs. The Dodge may "appear" beefier, but its an unboxed design, compared to the Chevy. When it is boxed, you can use thinner metal, and end up with a stronger overall structure.
My advice...Get a 6.2, avoid the curbs, and enjoy the best half ton powertrain available. I've driven them all, and nothing compares to the GM 6.2.
I'm not seeing a major difference between the 3 front end designs. The Dodge may "appear" beefier, but its an unboxed design, compared to the Chevy. When it is boxed, you can use thinner metal, and end up with a stronger overall structure.
My advice...Get a 6.2, avoid the curbs, and enjoy the best half ton powertrain available. I've driven them all, and nothing compares to the GM 6.2.