Notices
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

first 1/4 mile runs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2011, 10:47 AM
  #21  
On The Tree
 
chevz7102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is the 5.3l 6speed auto real close to the 6.2l for stock to stock 1/4 mile times?
Old 08-21-2011, 10:48 AM
  #22  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: oregon
Posts: 4,516
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Phil
what was your MPH in 2wheel drive? if you ran it
Old 08-21-2011, 11:32 AM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
 
06Sierra2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: el paso, tx
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chevz7102
Is the 5.3l 6speed auto real close to the 6.2l for stock to stock 1/4 mile times?
i could easily be wrong but i think they are almost a full second difference between the two
Old 08-21-2011, 12:16 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
NKPPhil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,074
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gonzo 6.0
Phil
what was your MPH in 2wheel drive? if you ran it
I launched in 4wd every time, then shifted into 2WD in second gear. Best mph was 90.37.
Old 08-21-2011, 12:25 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
NKPPhil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,074
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chevz7102
Is the 5.3l 6speed auto real close to the 6.2l for stock to stock 1/4 mile times?
I drove several 5.3 trucks and one with the 6.2 before I decided what I wanted. The 5.3 with 3.42 gears felt a lot stronger than my '99 5.3 with 3.73s, and it should with 40 more horsepower and the 6-speed. The 5.3 with 3.08s felt pretty flat compared to my old one. But the 6.2 was in a whole different league, as far as my seat-of-the-pants could tell. I'd like to know what the new 5.3s actually do at the track, but I bet 06Sierra2 is pretty close.
Old 08-21-2011, 12:29 PM
  #26  
TECH Resident
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NKPPhil
I drove several 5.3 trucks and one with the 6.2 before I decided what I wanted. The 5.3 with 3.42 gears felt a lot stronger than my '99 5.3 with 3.73s, and it should with 40 more horsepower and the 6-speed. The 5.3 with 3.08s felt pretty flat compared to my old one. But the 6.2 was in a whole different league, as far as my seat-of-the-pants could tell. I'd like to know what the new 5.3s actually do at the track, but I bet 06Sierra2 is pretty close.
+1

I had an '09 5.3 for 2 years and in stock form, it was a turd compared to the 6.2, stock vs stock.
Old 08-21-2011, 01:03 PM
  #27  
Man Motor club
 
rjwz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sunniest city on Earth
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My intake and tuned 6.2 CCSB 3.73 on 33s feels quicker in 2wd than 4wd unless I'm on a slick or dusty surface. I can feel the power loss in 4x4. Since we pretty much have the same truck, I would guess that you would run quicker in 2wd. I also run with TC/Stabilitrak disabled every time.
Old 08-21-2011, 01:14 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
NKPPhil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,074
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rjwz28
My intake and tuned 6.2 CCSB 3.73 on 33s feels quicker in 2wd than 4wd unless I'm on a slick or dusty surface. I can feel the power loss in 4x4. Since we pretty much have the same truck, I would guess that you would run quicker in 2wd. I also run with TC/Stabilitrak disabled every time.
Yeah, I pretty much figured that. I launched in 4wd this time for consistency and to save the tires. I'll repeat that when I add a tune, and any improvement in times will be directly because of the tune. Then I'll probably get excited and start trying to learn to launch it right in 2wd with all the junk disabled to see how good it can really do.
Old 08-21-2011, 01:26 PM
  #29  
Man Motor club
 
rjwz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sunniest city on Earth
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I ran an 05-09 Mustang GT from a stoplight to 70 in 2wd off-idle with the nannies off and a pretty hard launch. My bumper was at his shoulder when I let off.
Old 08-21-2011, 06:48 PM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pearland Tx
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NKPPhil
Yeah, I pretty much figured that. I launched in 4wd this time for consistency and to save the tires. I'll repeat that when I add a tune, and any improvement in times will be directly because of the tune. Then I'll probably get excited and start trying to learn to launch it right in 2wd with all the junk disabled to see how good it can really do.
Not only that, but I'm sure your pretty high up in the Sea Level. I live by Houston and were right at sea level, which is worth at least half a second in the quarter mile.

I'm extremely impressed with your time, especially if your stock and 3000ft + above sea level.


Quick Reply: first 1/4 mile runs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.