Notices
GMT 900 Trucks General Discussion 2007 - 2013 Trucks | General Discussion

1.75" compared to 1.875" headers, RESULTS!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2012, 07:38 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
99SLOWC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: milwaukee wisconsin
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1.75" compared to 1.875" headers, RESULTS!!!

Today we baselined my 2008 AWD Sierra Denali. Kooks catted 1.75" long tube headers. We then took those off and installed a set of American Racing headers catted 1.875" and re-dynoed it. The results are surprising.



Jeff

LMT
Old 02-04-2012, 07:45 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,835
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Wow, so no power difference. I assume the graph with the lost low end is with the bigger primaries.
Old 02-04-2012, 07:54 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
99SLOWC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: milwaukee wisconsin
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It makes more power down low with the 1-7/8 and basically the same up top.
Old 02-04-2012, 08:07 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
 
2007chevy5.3l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WOW thats crazy
Old 02-04-2012, 08:41 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
TXSZ66AVLANCHE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This proves again more exhaust is not always better.
Old 02-04-2012, 09:17 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TX Tahoe Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,835
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99SLOWC5
It makes more power down low with the 1-7/8 and basically the same up top.
You positive? I would have thought the smaller diameter would have kept velocity up and improved scavenging at lower rpms. I lost a good amount of low end going from manifolds to LT's.
Old 02-04-2012, 09:25 PM
  #7  
Launching!
 
11Silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is crazy, I have seen so many different dyno sheets between the battle of 1.75 vs 1.875" primaries its not even funny....every single vehicle responds so differently. Nevertheless, thanks for reporting the results!
Old 02-04-2012, 09:33 PM
  #8  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
99SLOWC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: milwaukee wisconsin
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very easy to say yes I'm positive on the results. I made the Dyno pulls on my Dyno. I'm quite positive on the 4 pulls I made with both sets of headers. The proof is in the graphs. I gain nothing by posting the results. We took my kooks headers off. Installed the ARH headers. And reinstalled my kooks for the soul purpose to see the difference.

Jeff
Old 02-04-2012, 09:34 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
tiffo60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks to me the 1 7/8 made more power in the midrange.... And this is with out any adjustments to the VVT
Old 02-04-2012, 09:40 PM
  #10  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
99SLOWC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: milwaukee wisconsin
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No this in my truck. It's tuned. Zero changes made. Only change between pulls is the headers only


Quick Reply: 1.75" compared to 1.875" headers, RESULTS!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 PM.