GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

VHO vs plain 5.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 09:51 AM
  #1  
98TAauto's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 0
From: Warsaw, Va
Default VHO vs plain 5.3?

guys, whats that major differences on the VHO's compared to the plain 5.3's? A buddie got one and I know they are rated at like 310hp which is only 20hp more then the 5.3's I think. Are they much quicker than the 5.3's stock vs stock?

just curious as to what makes them so special
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #2  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

VHO is a 345HP 6.0 Lq9 truck. L33=HO 5.3 310 HP it is in a xcab 4x4 only with different heads and cam,pistons and an aluminum block.There is a guy on here and his dynoed 309HP with a tune and catback and very little else.Badass in my opinion for a 5.3

Guys,did i forget any differeces?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #3  
MonteCarlo31's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Wesley Chapel, FL
Default

I think the VHO is also 2wd but uses the torsen bar setup front suspension (guess to support the weight from the 6.0) Also, has some nice looking 20s, I think they get the 9.5" rear end too. Not sure if they use hydro boost brakes or standard vac brakes.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #4  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

Originally Posted by MonteCarlo31
I think the VHO is also 2wd but uses the torsen bar setup front suspension (guess to support the weight from the 6.0) Also, has some nice looking 20s, I think they get the 9.5" rear end too. Not sure if they use hydro boost brakes or standard vac brakes.
The VHO is a 2x4,no more weight from a 6.0 than an Iron 5.3,9.5 came in 06 and i believe the 8.6 was in the 05s
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 05:18 PM
  #5  
OUT2WIN's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 2
From: Eastern Washington
Default

9.5 14bolt was in the 05s too
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 05:24 PM
  #6  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

thanks for the correction.You put down 305HP.What mods?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #7  
OUT2WIN's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 2
From: Eastern Washington
Default

Pacesetters, no cats, cai, W4M tune
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 06:48 PM
  #8  
nightrunner's Avatar
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2
From: Manchester, TN
Default

would it be quicker or not than a rcsb 5.3 stock for stock and modified for modified
because it is all about speed but i like the way a rcsb handles and looks but like the interior space of a ecsb
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #9  
v8
17,16,15,14,13,12,11 Drvr
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,713
Likes: 0
From: Mont Belvieu, Texas
Default

In most cases the stock vho will beat a stock 5.3 rcsb.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 08:23 PM
  #10  
OUT2WIN's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 2
From: Eastern Washington
Default

Originally Posted by v8
In most cases the stock vho will beat a stock 5.3 rcsb.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 PM.