GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

Some ones Bullsh!ting!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #71  
Hardtop's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 0
From: LaPlata, Md.
Default

Originally Posted by DUNGBEETLE
Beeftip has seen a ECSB with a Vortech supercharger and other mods running 14.5 or so. He had the 5.3. It just doesnt make any sense that your truck is running faster than a supercharged truck or the SS. The 5.3 stock is just not that fast
If you ever make it up to MD, I'll show ya.

Bruce
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 01:01 PM
  #72  
DUNGBEETLE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

Im not bashing on your truck, I just dont understand how one with a supercharger and all that can run slower than a stock truck?
Thanks though for your feedback
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 01:39 PM
  #73  
Todd@AZPowerAndSound's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Default

without a doubt Density altitude has a TON to do with Et's. Hell, in my last car I lost a 1/2 second off my ET moving from Chicago to Phoenix.

Anyway, my 04 5.3 rcsb with big ol' 22's went 15.7s@88 with headers & intake a couple months ago with a DA of about 3500ft. So, Im going to say your tune is part of the problem. Lets just say it was 95 degrees and 70% humidty that day you raced. Even then...you shoulda ran much better unless you were puttin on a smoke show.
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #74  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

F8L touched on this earlier, but I feel I must emphasis this. DA has a HUGE effect on your et/mph!

I know you're in GA and it gets pretty humid and nasty. Well if there's a lot of humidity(water vapor) in the air, then it displaces the oxygen molecules, which you need to make power. Also if your actual elev is high, that's a problem too, because at lower altitudes, the air is more dense. Think of it as a big column of air above you. The higher you are, theres less air there is above you, hence less wieght pushing down, leading to the air being less dense. Does that make sense?

13.45psi in my sig is the typical atmospheric pressure where I live. The standard is 14.7psi, just to give you an idea.

Stock SS's here run mid to low 16's, stock RCSB's run the same, stock LT1 f-bodies run mid 14's, stock LS1 f-bodies run mid to low 14's. This is just the way it is here. It's frustrtating seeing people post times 1sec faster than you, but put it in perspective. They probably have bad *** weather and track prep. Just compare yourself to others at your track.
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #75  
Teching In
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

dude i have run my truck...2002 silvy 5.3 w. edelbrock shorties, cut outs, nelson tune, K&N FIPK 2, with two 12s ina full box under the read seat and one person in the truck and ran a 15.4@ either 89 or 90 mph something like that
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #76  
DUNGBEETLE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

vanilla gorilla how do you like that SF3000 thats the one i was going to get, how much of an improvement have you seen, and how much other prep mods did you have or need to put that on and run right. Im not running a cam, just want to run 3000 stall, i already have 4.10's
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 03:42 PM
  #77  
DUNGBEETLE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Todd@DiscountTireDirect
without a doubt Density altitude has a TON to do with Et's. Hell, in my last car I lost a 1/2 second off my ET moving from Chicago to Phoenix.

Anyway, my 04 5.3 rcsb with big ol' 22's went 15.7s@88 with headers & intake a couple months ago with a DA of about 3500ft. So, Im going to say your tune is part of the problem. Lets just say it was 95 degrees and 70% humidty that day you raced. Even then...you shoulda ran much better unless you were puttin on a smoke show.
You also have a SC so you really cant compare the SC TO THE Exc
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 09:22 PM
  #78  
BeefTip's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between Auburn, AL and Columbus, GA
Default

i have a new silverado ss 2003 and ran a 12.03 bone stock
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 09:30 PM
  #79  
F8L Z71's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

Originally Posted by JoshsSilverado
dude i have run my truck...2002 silvy 5.3 w. edelbrock shorties, cut outs, nelson tune, K&N FIPK 2, with two 12s ina full box under the read seat and one person in the truck and ran a 15.4@ either 89 or 90 mph something like that
What exactly are you trying to say here? You have an extended cab truck that ran 15.4@89-90mph? If so then you are just as FAST as the thread author You are QUICKER than he is in the 1/4mile due to 60' most likely but your trap speed is the same so say in a freeway race it would go down to whoever nailed it first. BTW, your sig says you have a regular cab short bed.
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 09:32 PM
  #80  
F8L Z71's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

DUNGBEETLE,

If you have the EXACT time of your run and the name of your track and the city and state I can try to find out your DA for that run which will help put things into persective rather than speculation.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.