Hemi disapointment
#11
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
Originally Posted by stealth03ss
so your 345hp hemi went 15.24 at 5200lbs?
the SS beats that bone stock weighing 74lbs more and with AWD and the same exact 345hp. hehe
the SS beats that bone stock weighing 74lbs more and with AWD and the same exact 345hp. hehe
Jim
#12
Originally Posted by Ram4Pick
Well, there was a 150 eng hour rumor also, I never felt a damn thing. My truck has a little of 20K on it now, seems to have run the same from day one. I've also read that the computer adapts to your driving, you baby it and it won't perform as well as when you jump on it all the time. Don't know if it's true or not but I do know that if I'm all it on the time, my mpg sucks! I try and drive to get a little better mpg but do jump on it driving from time to time just in case that's true.
Jim
Jim
#13
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
Originally Posted by StrokerAce03
So what kind of gas mileage is your Hemi putting down? I've heard that 15 mpg was good for one but I can't remember where I heard it.
Jim
#14
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 5
From: Sittin on jackstands
I watched a bone stock SS used as a tow vehicle run 15.25 with 87* temps. It was the very first time the truck went down the track. the guy used it to pull his trailer with his race truck with, I finally talked him to taking the SS down.
Personally I think the SS and the HEMI should be faster. I also have a buddy with a rcsb that he swapped the 4.8 for a LQ(, and with the 4.8 tuning and one wheel peel runs 14.5 consistant. With my tune he gets no traction, but trapped 97 mph, which should put him around 13.9 or so. So why is Dodges rcsb 345 hp truck running low 15's? The LQ9 is rated 345HP also. Think it should be faster personally.
Personally I think the SS and the HEMI should be faster. I also have a buddy with a rcsb that he swapped the 4.8 for a LQ(, and with the 4.8 tuning and one wheel peel runs 14.5 consistant. With my tune he gets no traction, but trapped 97 mph, which should put him around 13.9 or so. So why is Dodges rcsb 345 hp truck running low 15's? The LQ9 is rated 345HP also. Think it should be faster personally.
#15
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
Originally Posted by white1
I watched a bone stock SS used as a tow vehicle run 15.25 with 87* temps. It was the very first time the truck went down the track. the guy used it to pull his trailer with his race truck with, I finally talked him to taking the SS down.
Personally I think the SS and the HEMI should be faster. I also have a buddy with a rcsb that he swapped the 4.8 for a LQ(, and with the 4.8 tuning and one wheel peel runs 14.5 consistant. With my tune he gets no traction, but trapped 97 mph, which should put him around 13.9 or so. So why is Dodges rcsb 345 hp truck running low 15's? The LQ9 is rated 345HP also. Think it should be faster personally.
Personally I think the SS and the HEMI should be faster. I also have a buddy with a rcsb that he swapped the 4.8 for a LQ(, and with the 4.8 tuning and one wheel peel runs 14.5 consistant. With my tune he gets no traction, but trapped 97 mph, which should put him around 13.9 or so. So why is Dodges rcsb 345 hp truck running low 15's? The LQ9 is rated 345HP also. Think it should be faster personally.
Jim
#16
Thread Starter
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,230
Likes: 5
From: Sittin on jackstands
Yea TM definatly sucks bad. It was very noticable in the Dodge. As far as weight. How much more does the Dodge weigh than the Chevy? And as far as the times,are you stating times for a rc, or qc HEMI? The SS is ex cab and AWD, so they are pretty heavy too. I'm not starting a pissing match, just stating what I noticed.
#17
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
Originally Posted by white1
Yea TM definatly sucks bad. It was very noticable in the Dodge. As far as weight. How much more does the Dodge weigh than the Chevy? And as far as the times,are you stating times for a rc, or qc HEMI? The SS is ex cab and AWD, so they are pretty heavy too. I'm not starting a pissing match, just stating what I noticed. 

Jim
#20
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between Auburn, AL and Columbus, GA
It must be something about the tracks around here because trucks dont run what they do on here, Im talking chevys and dodges. Saw a excab hemi 2wd w/20s run a 16.xx at around 84-84 and a single cab hemi on 20s, bone stock run a 15.4-15.5 @88. A excab 5.3 z71 w/free mods ran a 16.5 or so at the same track. Im not saying anyone is lying, i just know that this is where alot of arguments get started. I dont know if it is due to area gas, elevation, humidity or whatever. A single cab srt10 ram ran a 14.00 at 101(i know they are hard to launch). I know that my brother and Cammin03 run slower than some of the times seen on this board also. I dont know what im getting at.


