ECSB 5.3L N/A Record?
#31
Originally Posted by goshawk23
fellas, i think we are cheating ourselves. i don't know where yall live but down here there isn't any good race weather for at least another 6 months....if someone bust out some mid to low 13's in the heat we have right now, they have some good ****. i will salute them big time.

but Im still going to own Matt's *** on the 21st!!!
#32
Originally Posted by goshawk23
fellas, i think we are cheating ourselves. i don't know where yall live but down here there isn't any good race weather for at least another 6 months....if someone bust out some mid to low 13's in the heat we have right now, they have some good ****. i will salute them big time.
#34
Originally Posted by ap2002
you are absolutely right... I guess we have the same weather here in texas, our good weather and long gone until atleast november... I guess its just another topic to keep us busy... 
but Im still going to own Matt's *** on the 21st!!!

but Im still going to own Matt's *** on the 21st!!!

I thought you werent coming, hell now I may have to show
#35
formerly silverbrick (changed 02/17/2013)
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Tx
up there someone is runing an F4 226 cam with a 3000 stall only? isnt that a little small of a stall to be runnign with that cam? just wondering cuz im trying to get a good cam with my 3200 stall and i have been told that 224 would be about as big as i'd want to go...eventually i'd like to compete for this title but it will be a while until then as one, im poor, two i need a new cam, and three the truck is plain 6 years old and have 83xxx miles on it....
#36
Originally Posted by Soon2bSpooled
up there someone is runing an F4 226 cam with a 3000 stall only? isnt that a little small of a stall to be runnign with that cam? just wondering cuz im trying to get a good cam with my 3200 stall and i have been told that 224 would be about as big as i'd want to go...eventually i'd like to compete for this title but it will be a while until then as one, im poor, two i need a new cam, and three the truck is plain 6 years old and have 83xxx miles on it....
Its plenty of stall for that cam, One of my buddies ran a 3k with a 228/230 cam and it was perfect. Im running a 3000 with a 224/224 .581/.581 112lsa and could easily go bigger if I wanted to while keeping the 3000 converter
#37
formerly silverbrick (changed 02/17/2013)
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Tx
how do you like that cam? i was thinkin about it but wanted to go faster and bigger if my fuddle 3200 would supprt it i just know bigger isnt always better cam wise but i figure the stall would pretty much cover streetability and all.
#38
Originally Posted by 02White6.0
Its plenty of stall for that cam, One of my buddies ran a 3k with a 228/230 cam and it was perfect. Im running a 3000 with a 224/224 .581/.581 112lsa and could easily go bigger if I wanted to while keeping the 3000 converter
I ran a 3Kish Fuddle in my truck with a 222/224 112 and it needed a 3200 or 3400 to really haul *** out of the hole. That is a more fair comparison.
#39
Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Once again dude you have more CI and a higher CR it makes ALL the difference in the world. You are comparing apples to oranges not to mention he has an ecsb where you have an rcsb. Kinda misleading recommendation.
I ran a 3Kish Fuddle in my truck with a 222/224 112 and it needed a 3200 or 3400 to really haul *** out of the hole. That is a more fair comparison.
I ran a 3Kish Fuddle in my truck with a 222/224 112 and it needed a 3200 or 3400 to really haul *** out of the hole. That is a more fair comparison.

Yea, but my buddy is running a 226 in a ECSB 5.3L with a TCI3000 and it yanks HARD out of the hole. I think its the perfect setup.
#40
Originally Posted by Soon2bSpooled
how do you like that cam? i was thinkin about it but wanted to go faster and bigger if my fuddle 3200 would supprt it i just know bigger isnt always better cam wise but i figure the stall would pretty much cover streetability and all.
I think it will be just right IMO. And you are correct, bigger is not always better.






