Notices
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

carb'd 5.3/6.0 vs 406

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2010, 12:36 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
greenturtle05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgetown, South Carolina
Posts: 301
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default carb'd 5.3/6.0 vs 406

In the next few month or so im going to be swapping out my 5.3 for a 6.0. i also have another project im working on it's a 83 chevy caprice. i was going to build a 406(using a 400 block) to go in it, but im thinking about going a different route. im considering droping the 5.3 with a carb into the caprice with some stage 2 5.3 heads, or if i can find another cheap 6.0 i may consider that. My question is how would the carb'd 5.3 or 6.0 compare to the 406 power wise? im looking for a lot of low end torque. the 406 would consist of an eagle rotating assembly, forged flat tops, afr heads, air gap or victor intake, and i haven't decided on a cam yet. which would be the easiest swap?
Old 07-10-2010, 01:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
brent5631's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

It wont have the torque that the 406 would. the LS motors make their torque a lot higher.
Old 07-10-2010, 01:37 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
1Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jones Creek, Texas
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

At first I was going to say that if you were to do a basic build on the 406 that the LS motor would most likely still be a better overall combination, as the Gen III/IV heads are so much better than anything the factory ever offered for the traditional small-block’s, but since your looking at springing for a set of AFR’s for the old girl, it should be capable to put out some very good horsepower numbers as well as the torque the motors were known for. It would still be hard to beat the efficiency of the newer motors though, but never-the-less I believe the traditional small-block would be the easiest to transplant into your Caprice.
Old 07-10-2010, 04:29 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
greenturtle05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgetown, South Carolina
Posts: 301
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i haven't seen any carb'd 5.3/6.0 with h/c dyno. any idea how much power a good street/strip combo would make? the car is going to be driven on the street a good bit,but i'll also see some strip action too.
Old 07-10-2010, 09:09 PM
  #5  
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
budhayes3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hackensack, NJ
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If you're looking for a lot of low end torque, stick with the 406, those engines are torque monsters, plus it will be a direct swap into the Caprice while the 5.3/6.0 will require some creativity and fab work.

FWIW, my father (professional race engine builder) builds a lot of 427's starting with Dart 400 blocks, that run high 9's in the 1/4 on pump gas...
Old 07-11-2010, 02:21 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
2000silvrx81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Greenville, Texas
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would like to see the 6L in it! Don't take any credit away from it, if you put a set of good heads and a good cam it would make some pretty wicked power too...
Old 07-11-2010, 03:11 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
greenturtle05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgetown, South Carolina
Posts: 301
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what all i would need to do a ls swap into the car?wire harness, ecm, adapter plate for 700r4, engine mount conversion kit,and what else? with a h/c/ 6.0 and a 200 shot of juice i should be in the same hp/tq range as the 406 correct?
Old 07-14-2010, 12:50 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
greenturtle05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgetown, South Carolina
Posts: 301
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anybody?
Old 07-14-2010, 01:05 PM
  #9  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
TXoldskool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: McKinney, TX
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

stroke the 6.0L....and make a 402-408 out of it.
Old 07-14-2010, 02:10 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
JoeGibbSilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Memphis, 10
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i like the ls engines as much as the next guy, but the 406 is no slouch. those engines run pure and simple, hard to find a block though....most of the time they are cracked


Quick Reply: carb'd 5.3/6.0 vs 406



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM.