any of these kills good?
#1
-2004 ford f-150 5.4 3 valve ecsb
-2004 chevy 5.3 ecsb (i know own kind but still fun)
-2002 chevy 5.3 ecsb
-198? MR2 non-turbo....lol
pretty much dead in vermont for s racing......
-2004 chevy 5.3 ecsb (i know own kind but still fun)
-2002 chevy 5.3 ecsb
-198? MR2 non-turbo....lol
pretty much dead in vermont for s racing......
#2
Originally Posted by bourbeaugmcx
-2004 ford f-150 5.4 3 valve ecsb
-2004 chevy 5.3 ecsb (i know own kind but still fun)
-2002 chevy 5.3 ecsb
-198? MR2 non-turbo....lol
pretty much dead in vermont for s racing......
-2004 chevy 5.3 ecsb (i know own kind but still fun)
-2002 chevy 5.3 ecsb
-198? MR2 non-turbo....lol
pretty much dead in vermont for s racing......
EC are heavy turds. mine feels somewhat quick at times, but slow mostly. wish i could have a chance to ride in a RC to see the difference.
#4
Originally Posted by KeukaZ71
EC are heavy turds. mine feels somewhat quick at times, but slow mostly. wish i could have a chance to ride in a RC to see the difference.
AND
For a 99 4.8 which was rated at 250hp(?) to get those kills is respectable. But not the MR2, thats just sad.
#5
Originally Posted by GoldenVelvet
Hey Keuka where have you been lately? Havnt seen you in here for a waile.
AND
For a 99 4.8 which was rated at 250hp(?) to get those kills is respectable. But not the MR2, thats just sad.
AND
For a 99 4.8 which was rated at 250hp(?) to get those kills is respectable. But not the MR2, thats just sad.
i'm in the mode for a nice kill. been a while for that too. i'll take anything i can get. i don't even care if it is a minivan, or even a ricer.
nice kills again BTW
Trending Topics
#8
3 of the 4 are good kills. I got beat by my buddies ecsb 5.3L every 4 out of 5 races. He had an 02 and a 04 ecsb stock. I had work done, so those kills are very respectable to me! Good job!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06 4.8
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
6
Aug 21, 2015 11:33 PM
therock
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
4
Jul 25, 2015 09:23 AM



