Notices
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

aluminum/steel 5.3s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2006, 06:21 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
hoosierdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: indy
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up aluminum/steel 5.3s

Anyone know the years/vehicles that have aluminum 5.3s?
I have a 72 SS ElCamino that I am going to upgrade. Thinking about either an aluminum 5.3 or steel 6.0 with an automatic.
Not really looking for the baddest, just something drivable and kool.
Any comments/suggestions?
Old 10-08-2006, 06:26 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
negativeswitches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: belleville, il
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think the 5.3 powered ssr's had aluminum not sure but it's a start
Old 10-08-2006, 06:44 PM
  #3  
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
trever1t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

'05 Z71 Sierra's have the L33 Alum blocks.
Old 10-08-2006, 07:08 PM
  #4  
Mr. Obvious
iTrader: (4)
 
nightrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manchester, TN
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

trever's right but chevy's had em too it was an option on z71s for only 1 or 2 years

its a pretty rare option/motor

an iron block 5.3 would be easier to find and more than likely cheaper
Old 10-09-2006, 05:56 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
nick993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, CA.
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think if anyone got to choose between a all aluminum 5.3, and a iron 6.0, they would get the 6 liter, LQ9 if your lucky. they respond better to anything you put on it.

and the 6L would look perfect in a elco. a 5.3 would look small, just a 327(325).
Old 10-09-2006, 06:18 PM
  #6  
Hunt&Fisherator
iTrader: (15)
 
silver-mod-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SETx
Posts: 14,314
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nick993
i think if anyone got to choose between a all aluminum 5.3, and a iron 6.0, they would get the 6 liter, LQ9 if your lucky. they respond better to anything you put on it.

and the 6L would look perfect in a elco. a 5.3 would look small, just a 327(325).
4.8, 5.3, 6.0's and even strokers are all the same external dimensions... how could a 5.3 look smaller than a 6.0???
Old 10-09-2006, 06:22 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
hoosierdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: indy
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the comments/suggestions.
I'm leaning toward the 6.0. There's no substitute for cubic inches, just concerned I'll get carried away and not make it driveable!
Old 10-09-2006, 06:24 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHEVRACER83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere around -199C
Posts: 7,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by silver-mod-o
4.8, 5.3, 6.0's and even strokers are all the same external dimensions... how could a 5.3 look smaller than a 6.0???

AGREEEEEEDDDDDD!!!!! all ls motors 4.8, 5.3, 6.0 are all teh same size externally.

so if the 5.3 looks small then maybe you should get a smaller car or a bigger motor..... or get your eyes checked....
Old 10-11-2006, 08:22 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
nick993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, CA.
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so cubic inch doesnt mean anything on these motors? thats just internal? so you could bore a 5.3 to a 6.0?
Old 10-11-2006, 08:36 PM
  #10  
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
trever1t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No. All LSx engines share external dims and most parts are interchageable but internal dims are different.


Quick Reply: aluminum/steel 5.3s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.