PerformanceTrucks.net Forums

GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion 2006 & Older Trucks | General Discussion

94 5.0 SC rustang vs me

   
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 11:59 PM
  #1  
5.3 racer16
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default 94 5.0 SC rustang vs me
there is a 94 mustang 5.0 with a powerdyne supercharger around me , how bad can he beat me? he is all stock except for the sc. not even flowmaster.really bad screech sounds instead of whining has bad miles
Reply
0
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 12:01 AM
  #2  
goshawk23's Avatar
goshawk23
Truck addict
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,559
Likes: 0
From: Ocean Springs, MS
Default
considering it is a high 14 sec car stock. that charger probably dropped him to low 14's. where do you run at. i don't see him in the 13's at all with no other mods.
Reply
0
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 12:10 AM
  #3  
5.3 racer16
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: TX
Default
deep south texas where tiburon is at. and bad black ss
Reply
0
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 12:24 AM
  #4  
goshawk23's Avatar
goshawk23
Truck addict
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,559
Likes: 0
From: Ocean Springs, MS
Default
i was meaning where are your times. sorry i should have specified better. what do you run for times...i imagine he is going to be a low 14 sec car....
Reply
0
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 12:40 PM
  #5  
GoldenVelvet's Avatar
GoldenVelvet
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 0
From: Fresno/Chico
Default
My really good friend has a 95 with just a few bolt ons and is in the high 13's, so watch out.... . .
Reply
0
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
01Blackerado's Avatar
01Blackerado
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default
yeah but i think 95 was the beginning of the 4.8 which i thought was supposed to be faster!!
Reply
0
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 01:37 PM
  #7  
fullthrottledan's Avatar
fullthrottledan
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Indy, IN
Default
95 was still the 5.0, 96 was the first year for the 4.6 in the mustang.
with your mods in your sig, id say hes got you
Reply
0

Trending Topics

Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #8  
2002C5COUPE's Avatar
2002C5COUPE
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
From: Alvin, TX
Default
i think his car is probably still in the 14s with that crappy blower, but i don't think you'd beat him...get some nitrous and you'd have no problem
Reply
0
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:09 PM
  #9  
KeukaZ71's Avatar
KeukaZ71
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
From: New York
Default
only one way to find out
Reply
0
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #10  
GoldenVelvet's Avatar
GoldenVelvet
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 0
From: Fresno/Chico
Default
Originally Posted by 01Blackerado
yeah but i think 95 was the beginning of the 4.8 which i thought was supposed to be faster!!
The first MOD 4.6 was slower then the old 5.0. The MOD 4.6 didnt get fast untill the went with the PI motors which had different heads, intake, computer, ignition and cams...
Reply
0

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Advanced Search

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 AM.