GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Why does the LQ4's in the 3500's make less power than the Denali's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 09:25 PM
  #1  
VINCE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,176
Likes: 0
From: Valrico, Florida
Default Why does the LQ4's in the 3500's make less power than the Denali's?

I would think more NA power would be better for towing.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 10:48 PM
  #2  
02_Orange_D1SC's Avatar
Fastest D1 Procharged Truck
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 0
From: mASSHOLE
Default

which year are you talking about? if its the same as your truck in your sig then they should be the same. the denalis didnt get the LQ9 till 05 iirc.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2010 | 11:40 PM
  #3  
1Bear's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 8
From: Jones Creek, Texas
Default

Denali’s with LQ4’s were rated at 325 & 330 depending on the year model, so yes they were rated higher, Yes they are still the exact same motor as what would have been found in a 2500/3500, the difference being in tuning and slightly different exhaust system. The biggest reason would be a milder configuration of tune due to the likely possibility of being loaded heavily. Of course in a lot of the applications it is sometimes a marketing ploy as well, you don’t want a lower end unit advertising the same as the top of the line model. In some cases it’s not exactly a lie, the HP/torque rating may just be read at a lower rpm. If you can think of a scenario, they have successfully tried it!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 03:55 AM
  #4  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Originally Posted by 1Bear
Denali’s with LQ4’s were rated at 325 & 330 depending on the year model, so yes they were rated higher, Yes they are still the exact same motor as what would have been found in a 2500/3500, the difference being in tuning and slightly different exhaust system. The biggest reason would be a milder configuration of tune due to the likely possibility of being loaded heavily. Of course in a lot of the applications it is sometimes a marketing ploy as well, you don’t want a lower end unit advertising the same as the top of the line model. In some cases it’s not exactly a lie, the HP/torque rating may just be read at a lower rpm. If you can think of a scenario, they have successfully tried it!
Fabulous, right on
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 04:10 AM
  #5  
Parke10's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield,Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Mangled03gmc
Fabulous, right on
Fabulous?! someones gay..
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 08:07 AM
  #6  
StrokerAce03's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 1
From: Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by 1Bear
Of course in a lot of the applications it is sometimes a marketing ploy as well, you don’t want a lower end unit advertising the same as the top of the line model. In some cases it’s not exactly a lie, the HP/torque rating may just be read at a lower rpm. If you can think of a scenario, they have successfully tried it!



Just like the f-bodies and Corvettes.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 09:51 AM
  #7  
La Tu Papi's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Mexico
Default

Originally Posted by StrokerAce03


Just like the f-bodies and Corvettes.
The Fbodys and Corvettes actually use a different cam. Then you have the differences in the dual exhaust vs single exhaust, manifolds are less restrictive then the fbody ones. Years ago they did a test of the vette's manifolds vs a set of pacesetter headers and the vettes manifolds were within 5 hp of the pacesetters
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 01:59 PM
  #8  
1Bear's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 8
From: Jones Creek, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by La Tu Papi
The Fbodys and Corvettes actually use a different cam. Then you have the differences in the dual exhaust vs single exhaust, manifolds are less restrictive then the fbody ones. Years ago they did a test of the vette's manifolds vs a set of pacesetter headers and the vettes manifolds were within 5 hp of the pacesetters
That's correct depending on the year model, there were quite a few various cams used in the Gen III's, however even though the ’01-’03 Corvette/Camaro/Firebird all used cam ID 1721 for the base LS1, they were still rated differently. We still come back to tune, exhaust & rating differences.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #9  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

Originally Posted by Parke10akameatlover
Fabulous?! someones gay..
Don''t you have a test to be taking??
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2010 | 06:26 PM
  #10  
VINCE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,176
Likes: 0
From: Valrico, Florida
Default

All of you guys make sense.. I just thought it was odd that one would show higher hp when the latter truck is lighter and you would think it would be quicker for that simple fact.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 AM.