GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

what exhaust size and configuration would be best for my truck to maximize power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2021 | 09:00 AM
  #1  
1redta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 599
Likes: 60
From: fort campbell
Default what exhaust size and configuration would be best for my truck to maximize power

I recently put a new engine in my 2008 GMC Sierra 2wd truck. I used a new gen4 GM block, K1 58tooth 3.622” crank, 6.125 K1 rods and BTR/Wiseco pistons with valve reliefs that roughly calculated to a 10.4 compression I also used a summit under drive dampner.

The heads are stock 243/799 with comp bee hive springs and trunion upgrade on the rockers. I have a set of TSP 1 3/4” long tubes and y going to 3” tubing, a vibrant resonator beside the trans to a huge magnaflow after the rear end exiting behind the wheel in the stock location all 3” also.

im using the nnbs throttle body and intake to a MIT tune to a Airaid filter n the stock box. The cam is a BTR truck 2. While tuning John Weeks told me the stock injectors were flowing 105% so I’m going to get the flex fuel injectors, they were fine on the original LY5 5.3.

I’m wondering if the single 3” is a little small for the engine now. I’m guessing around 470 crank HP due to injector flow and Holdner dyno videos.

thanks!
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2021 | 09:15 AM
  #2  
smokinlmm's Avatar
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 557
From: Coastal NC
Default

3" will be plenty for your hp level.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2021 | 03:55 PM
  #3  
swathdiver's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
5 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 393
Likes: 64
From: Treasure Coast of Florida
Default

Originally Posted by 1redta
I recently put a new engine in my 2008 GMC Sierra 2wd truck. I used a new gen4 GM block, K1 58tooth 3.622” crank, 6.125 K1 rods and BTR/Wiseco pistons with valve reliefs that roughly calculated to a 10.4 compression I also used a summit under drive dampner.

The heads are stock 243/799 with comp bee hive springs and trunion upgrade on the rockers. I have a set of TSP 1 3/4” long tubes and y going to 3” tubing, a vibrant resonator beside the trans to a huge magnaflow after the rear end exiting behind the wheel in the stock location all 3” also.

im using the nnbs throttle body and intake to a MIT tune to a Airaid filter n the stock box. The cam is a BTR truck 2. While tuning John Weeks told me the stock injectors were flowing 105% so I’m going to get the flex fuel injectors, they were fine on the original LY5 5.3.

I’m wondering if the single 3” is a little small for the engine now. I’m guessing around 470 crank HP due to injector flow and Holdner dyno videos.

thanks!
The 6.2 Sierras run a 3.5" exhaust. Make some passes down the quarter mile at your nearest track and weigh the truck to determine how much horsepower is actually making it to the pavement. 470 seems optimistic to me for a 5.3.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2021 | 10:02 AM
  #4  
1redta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 599
Likes: 60
From: fort campbell
Default

it’s a 6.0 should have mentioned that in the original post
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2021 | 01:24 PM
  #5  
BigKID's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,947
Likes: 242
From: Panama City, Fl
Default

Did Weeks not tune it on a dyno? Shouldn't have to guess based on fuel consumption.

For a 6.0 with slight compression bump, untouched heads and 212.218 cam, (assuming mandrel bent pipe and a good transition at the Y) the exhaust described in the op would be fine unless you were wanting to ring every last hp out of it on the top end. If that were the case, headers would need to be upsized as well.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2021 | 02:33 PM
  #6  
1redta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 599
Likes: 60
From: fort campbell
Default

street tune is all we did, it’s has a ton of torque compared to the 5.3 it replaced, just wanted to see if any gains would be realized by more exhaust mods

thanks everyone
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2021 | 02:36 PM
  #7  
shakenfake's Avatar
Shlumpt
5 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 4,451
Likes: 1,522
From: Shlumpt, TX
Default

I do suggest bumping up to something larger than the FF injectors so as to future proof.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2021 | 05:00 PM
  #8  
Beatdown Z's Avatar
Laid Back
15 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 10
From: Newark, DE
Default

No back-to-back testing, but i switched to a single 3.5” after my heads/cam 6.0 started blowing apart the single 3” at one of the band clamp connections.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2021 | 06:23 PM
  #9  
1redta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 599
Likes: 60
From: fort campbell
Default

I’m going to try a 3.5” after a visit to the track and bigger injectors
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2021 | 06:41 PM
  #10  
smokinlmm's Avatar
TECH Addict
10 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,095
Likes: 557
From: Coastal NC
Default

[QUOTE=Beatdown Z;5504640]No back-to-back testing, but i switched to a single 3.5” after my heads/cam 6.0 started blowing apart the single 3” at one of the band clamp connections.[/QUOTE/]

Were you running mufflers?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.