GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

westers dyno results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 10:00 PM
  #11  
smokeydoge's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Nice gains. I've had my Westers 89/93 for a year and it STILL makes me smile I everytime I drive it !!! I'm about to upgrade, too ?!!? Whoo-hoo !!!!!

Wester knows his stuff .
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #12  
davew72's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: AL
Default

I wonder why your truck dynoed so low, my truck with just exhaust put down 240hp and 352 tq. Granted I have the 4l80 and you have the allision but the numbers shouldnt be that far off.

Alex
yours stock 8.1/4l80e 240 rwhp 352 tq exaust
mine stock 8.1/ally 245 rwhp 299 tq airaid

this is probaly about right your exaust probaly freed up about 25 to 30 extra highend lbtq and your 4l80e prob is less restrictive on torque than my allsion by 15 to 20 lbtq.

also your truck has 3.73'S TO My 4.10'S That could cause a little difference in torque. not sure which way but it would cause some difference

if your truck has the 10.5 rear diff that could factor in as well mine has the 11.5 diff

Did you dyno on the 285's in your sig or on the stock size tires? that could cause more difference than any thing my dyno was done on 285's
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 08:50 AM
  #13  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

the allison and the larger rear diff are enough to chop the nuts off your numbers. not bad considering the parasitic drag.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #14  
02_2500avalanche's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Woburn, Mass.
Default

It had 245's on it when I dynoed it. Ya there definitley are alot of factoras I didn't weight in. Any ways I thought only the dmax trucks had the AA 11.5" rear end, my truck does have the 10.5".

Alex
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 08:34 PM
  #15  
sbmowrey's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: DuBois Pa
Default

I have the 2002 k3500 with the 8.1/allison and the specs from the factory are 340hp@4200rpm/455lb-ft@3200rpm
It seem from this that the driveline loss is more than the 26% ??
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 09:11 PM
  #16  
davew72's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: AL
Default

I think the factory specs on the h.p. are 330 h.p. for the 8.1, thats what my 2001 is. if you take my dyno number of 246.23 using the division method
246.23 h.p. divided by .74 percent = 332.74 h.p. at the crank

the torque does seem a little off though

299 tq divided by .74 percent = 404.05 tq at the crank so the torque loss is more like 30 percent
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #17  
02_2500avalanche's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: Woburn, Mass.
Default

the specs for the 01 to 03 8.1's are 340hp and 455tq. 04 and up 8.1's are 320hp and 450tq due to some programming changes and adding pre cats.

Alex
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2005 | 11:01 AM
  #18  
sbmowrey's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: DuBois Pa
Default

Can any of you that have dyno'd post your graphs. I'm looking at the rpm that the max values were achieved at and can't fit these with the factory specs. I'm trying to get a feel for the best rpm to tow at. I beleive this would be somewhere near peak torque (455lb-ft at 3200rpm).
thanks Sam
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
$A_Money$81
FORCED INDUCTION
24
Mar 27, 2023 10:25 AM
Go5.3tt06
Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
25
Sep 4, 2016 10:25 AM
Lthompson
FORCED INDUCTION
4
Oct 2, 2015 12:45 AM
jscherbs
GM Parts Classifieds
3
Sep 30, 2015 07:54 AM
norris_83
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
0
Sep 9, 2015 04:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.