GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

WCCH pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 09:09 AM
  #11  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Reseda, CA
Default

The heads were tested on a Superflow 600 flow bench using a Brzenski Racing test bore fixture. The intake ports are tested with a radiused flow plate and the exhaust ports are tested with a stub pipe. As far as flow in the lower lifts are concerned, we've found this 6.0l setup to give a generous amount of flow across the useable lift curve. If I pump up the intake's low lift numbers more, then I sacrifice flow at .500" and above. As it is, the intake ports typically peak flow at .575" lift. Also, most LS6 and 6.0l heads we've tested that were prepped by other shops averaged 2-5% less flow in the lower lifts than our 6.0L Stage 2 head. Our LS6 Stage 2 can't keep up with the low lift flow that the 317's make. The difference is due to the shape of the chambers. The 317's chambers are layed back compared to the LS6 heads. I can't comment on the flow numbers offered up by others. The bottom line here will be performance. As more heads are installed, results will follow. Stay tuned..........

Richard
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 10:06 PM
  #12  
Kano's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

Originally Posted by mattrem
What cam are you using?
FM-11 114
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 10:16 PM
  #13  
Formulized94's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Richard@WCCH
The heads were tested on a Superflow 600 flow bench using a Brzenski Racing test bore fixture. The intake ports are tested with a radiused flow plate and the exhaust ports are tested with a stub pipe. As far as flow in the lower lifts are concerned, we've found this 6.0l setup to give a generous amount of flow across the useable lift curve. If I pump up the intake's low lift numbers more, then I sacrifice flow at .500" and above. As it is, the intake ports typically peak flow at .575" lift. Also, most LS6 and 6.0l heads we've tested that were prepped by other shops averaged 2-5% less flow in the lower lifts than our 6.0L Stage 2 head. Our LS6 Stage 2 can't keep up with the low lift flow that the 317's make. The difference is due to the shape of the chambers. The 317's chambers are layed back compared to the LS6 heads. I can't comment on the flow numbers offered up by others. The bottom line here will be performance. As more heads are installed, results will follow. Stay tuned..........

Richard
Richard,

I was not bad mouthing your product by any means, it is a fine looking setup. I figured that the head was flowed on a Super Flow 600, that bench seems to give more realistic numbers. If you do not mind me asking what size valve do you put in your 317 castings? It may have been posted, as I am probably over looking it. I also like that you flowed i on a 4.030 bore rather than 4.125, as I have seen people do. I assume to increase their numbers. Anyhow, I did not want anyone to think I was knocking these heads.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #14  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

Originally Posted by Kano
FM-11 114

what are the specs?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 11:49 PM
  #15  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Reseda, CA
Default

I didn't take it as bad mouthing in any way. Your question is very legitamite here. As an FYI to readers of this forum I use a flow bench made by JKM. I've modifyied the original design to yield legitimate flow data as it originally reported very low cfm compared to Superflow benches and they missed a bit on the engineering. Now fixed, I really like this bench alot. Still, I make use of a Superflow bench to report mainstream testing values and to provide a secondary or backup report. I always use the same flow fixtures to be consistent between benches. The flow sheets included with our heads are usually obtained from the Superflow bench, however on occasion I may post data from the JKM. I'll be sure to make a note to add the bench model in future tests although the CNC ports vary so little, it shouldn't make much difference. Feel free to write or give us a call anytime if you want to discuss this topic.

Richard

Originally Posted by Formulized94
Richard,

I was not bad mouthing your product by any means, it is a fine looking setup. I figured that the head was flowed on a Super Flow 600, that bench seems to give more realistic numbers. If you do not mind me asking what size valve do you put in your 317 castings? It may have been posted, as I am probably over looking it. I also like that you flowed i on a 4.030 bore rather than 4.125, as I have seen people do. I assume to increase their numbers. Anyhow, I did not want anyone to think I was knocking these heads.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 11:52 PM
  #16  
Richard@WCCH's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
From: Reseda, CA
Default

All our Stage 2 CNC ported heads use 2.02"/1.57" valves.

Richard

Originally Posted by Formulized94
If you do not mind me asking what size valve do you put in your 317 castings?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #17  
Kano's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

Originally Posted by moregrip
what are the specs?
228/230 576 595 114
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #18  
mattrem's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: W.Long Branch,NJ
Default

thats a pretty good size cam. What stall do you use?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #19  
Kano's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Winston Salem NC
Default

yank 3000
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2005 | 04:43 PM
  #20  
mattrem's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
From: W.Long Branch,NJ
Default

Kano, sounds like a nice combo there. good luck. I think I see a stall in my future, Just which one? lol
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SloSVO
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
9
Nov 22, 2020 07:34 PM
dsbodley
New Members
1
Nov 14, 2015 09:46 PM
03sierraslt
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
14
Oct 9, 2015 05:53 AM
GMCtrk
FORCED INDUCTION
41
Oct 5, 2015 11:18 AM
KINGCYCLES
GM Parts Classifieds
1
Oct 2, 2015 10:21 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.