TR224 + LT or Stall?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 7, 2008 | 11:20 PM

#11

BlackGMC

Resident Retard

iTrader: (31)

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 17,216

Likes: 20

From: Fort Worth - TX

Quote:

Originally Posted by GMCtrk

Yeah, I'm leaning towards LT/cam myself. With the TR224 I shouldn't lose anything down low so it should be the same as it is now. I should gain above 3000 though.

A friend of mine has a 6.0 with LTs and a 224 cam and he is on the stock converter and he has traction problems.... Just my .02....

https://www.performancetrucks.net/fo...d.php?t=425742

Oct 7, 2008 | 11:28 PM

#12

GMCtrk

Thread Starter

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (27)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 12,275

Likes: 19

From: Dallas

So you're confirming what I'm saying, right? According to Zippy it's all in the tune

Oct 7, 2008 | 11:37 PM

#13

silver-mod-o

Hunt&Fisherator

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 14,314

Likes: 17

From: SETx

I'd do a 3200-3400 converter first myself, that's gonna give you the best SOTP difference... Pick two and I'd say the cam and converter... Then of course, you can do all 3. And of course, tuning, tuning, tuning....

Oct 8, 2008 | 03:35 AM

#14

LMSeven

TECH Resident

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 980

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by silver-mod-o

I'd go cam + stall. You'll have better times with that combo (with traction).

Oct 8, 2008 | 09:48 AM

#15

dlt76028

12 Second Truck Club

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 5,883

Likes: 2

From: Crowley, TX

when i put stock manifolds on my cammed 6.0 it didnt even feel or sound like i had a cam at all. then i put LTs back on and i bet i gained 40hp.. the cam has to have free flowing exhaust to breath otherwise its choked up.