Tr224
Mar 30, 2004 | 01:21 PM
#11
TECH Junkie
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,271
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Originally Posted by Scream
Chris, that cam would be pretty radical in a 5.3. It is slightly larger than the Hammer cam. It would pull like a beast up top, but you would probably loose some down low.
I would personally go with the 212/218 high lift Comp Cam if I were you, or maybe a TR 220 on a 114.
I would personally go with the 212/218 high lift Comp Cam if I were you, or maybe a TR 220 on a 114.
Mar 30, 2004 | 02:31 PM
#14
12 Second Truck Club
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,575
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
It's gonna be a dog down low. I promise 
Even with my stall I hate anything below 4k rpm. It's gonna peak maaaybe 200rpm below mine (5,900 then flat to 6,500) but power doesn't really start till 4.5k.
On the top end it runs like a madman though
Even with my stall I hate anything below 4k rpm. It's gonna peak maaaybe 200rpm below mine (5,900 then flat to 6,500) but power doesn't really start till 4.5k.
On the top end it runs like a madman though
Mar 30, 2004 | 10:38 PM
#16
TECH Resident
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Wayne Mi
Originally Posted by Snake Eater
I think it would be great. Sound and run SICK!. If your getting it from Scream, just see if he can do a little Edit tuning for it. I dont think it will work to well without tuning though.
how does your cam idle?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RandomHero
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
3
Dec 12, 2006 11:03 PM
RoosterMcCandles
GM Parts Classifieds
9
Oct 4, 2006 03:57 PM
dirt track racer 81
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
31
Aug 3, 2006 05:45 PM