GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Thinking about going true dual

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 08:57 AM
  #11  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Originally Posted by PathfinderJr
right, but even 2.5" duals are decently big for only 325 cubes. 2.25" duals is just a tad larger x-sectional area compared to a 3" single. It just doesn't sound as manly to say 2.25" duals I guess...

Just for a comparison, even though its different generations of small-block, the hopped up 350 in my '66 truck made ~400hp/~415lb-ft torque on an engine dyno. Torque was about 400 lb-ft at 3.5k all the way until about 5k. This was running through 1-5/8" headers with 2.5" collectors, and has 2.5" duals on the truck with an x-pipe.

I could be wrong, but I doubt the engine in your truck is that strong, and you'd have more area under the torque curve in the usable rpm range that you'd be in on a day to day basis with 2.25" dual. But hey, its your truck, so do whatever pulls your trigger.
I'd say I'm in the 380-390 hp range at the crank man. And i see plenty of guys running true dual on completely stock trucks around here with no problems. but I'm still thinking about going with zzebes exhaust.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #12  
bluecajun5.3's Avatar
11 Second Truck Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,861
Likes: 0
From: Breaux Bridge, LA
Default

alright, don't listen to us then.
let your performance suck with 3" into 2.5" true duals

what zzebes has?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #13  
InchUp's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 00ChevyScott
I said I wanted to do dual 3" into the X pipe, then dual 2.5 out...
It's still a power sacrifice across your entire rev range except for maybe 6500 rpms. If that's where you think the motor will be revving all the time then sure, dual 3" it is.

If you think you're in the 380-390hp range, dual 2.5" is all your motor requires. I'd go as far as necking down to 2.25" after the X-pipe to keep exhaust gas velocity up.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #14  
ChevyTruck's Avatar
something else
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Default

i have 2.5" all the way to the mufflers then 3" from there on out. noticed a difference from silngle 3 from high flow cats on out, to the dual exaust.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #15  
00ChevyScott's Avatar
Thread Starter
Wearin' da big hat
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,262
Likes: 9
From: Over There
Default

Originally Posted by bluecajun5.3
alright, don't listen to us then.
let your performance suck with 3" into 2.5" true duals

what zzebes has?

no, his exhaust is 3" single.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2008 | 10:42 PM
  #16  
supercharged tahoe ss's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
Default

old set up stock y pipe magnoflow 1 into 2.5 inch dual 451 torque new set up pacesetters high flow IMCO metal core cats x pipe 2 16 inch imco mufflers 3 inch from front to back new set up 492 torque. engine is out right now getting all forged new dyno numbers comming soon. [IMG]

Last edited by supercharged tahoe ss; Aug 21, 2008 at 10:47 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Raggedz71
TOWING & OFFROAD PERFORMANCE
3
Jul 29, 2016 10:20 AM
thewrx
Cars and Motorcycle Classifieds
1
Aug 12, 2015 08:28 PM
Zack R
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
3
Aug 3, 2015 06:02 PM
lxcoupe
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
1
Jul 30, 2015 02:42 PM
Offroadunleashed
Trucks and SUV Classifieds
0
Jul 20, 2015 02:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.