GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Speed Engineering True Dual Exhaust Prototype..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 09:54 PM
  #461  
Tig's Avatar
Tig
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 29
From: Earth
Default

Originally Posted by Jaxon2580
Alright so I had the shop install my headers and i was told 2.5 would be best but after they finished I noticed the pipes were crushed bent and not mandrel bent. The truck is strong pretty much all the way through but mid range suffered a bit I'm wondering if I ahouldve went dual 3 inch...
If you don't mind me asking. How much did the shop charge you?

Its true what wolf said, mandrel benders aren't very common. Though, there is a guy who has one local to me.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 10:01 PM
  #462  
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 105
From: FL
Default

Just sayin'...

Reply
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 10:01 PM
  #463  
Jaxon2580's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 123
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Tig
If you don't mind me asking. How much did the shop charge you?

Its true what wolf said, mandrel benders aren't very common. Though, there is a guy who has one local to me.
Quite a bit. I paid for header install, the dual exhaust and two mufflers/ 4 inch tips. 550ish. It's strong but i just don't feel like I got my money's worth to be honest.. I didn't even read anything about mandrel vs crush until I looked at the pipes and everyone is saying if its crushed I might as well have done a 3 inch all the way back because the bends would crush down to 2.5 anyway. I wanna think that using 1 7/8 made me lose that mid range but I'm pretty sure it's the 2.5 pipes and crush bends
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2016 | 10:02 PM
  #464  
Jaxon2580's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 123
Likes: 3
Default

Yea but that's at the primaries in the headers. I can't find it now but I watched a few vids where they dynoed crush bent vs mandrel and there was a difference in power and noise
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2016 | 10:53 AM
  #465  
Speed Engineering's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,059
Likes: 10
From: California
Default

For those that are curious about primary tube sizes, and horse power/torque gains & losses this a really good older thread to read. SBC and LS engines are different birds when it comes to performance gains and exhaust. I wouldn't read too much into dyno results with SBC engines. 1 5/8" use the be the way to go. It is no longer the case with LS engines. Every 1 5/8" header we have had on the dyno usually ends up glowing red from restriction lol.

Stock Motor 1 3/4" Vs. 1 7/8 Engine Dyno Results!! - LS1TECH

Thanks
Sean
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2016 | 11:47 PM
  #466  
Jaxon2580's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 123
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Speed Engineering
For those that are curious about primary tube sizes, and horse power/torque gains & losses this a really good older thread to read. SBC and LS engines are different birds when it comes to performance gains and exhaust. I wouldn't read too much into dyno results with SBC engines. 1 5/8" use the be the way to go. It is no longer the case with LS engines. Every 1 5/8" header we have had on the dyno usually ends up glowing red from restriction lol.

Stock Motor 1 3/4" Vs. 1 7/8 Engine Dyno Results!! - LS1TECH

Thanks
Sean
When will you guys put the near stock 5.3 on the dyno with your 3 inch true dual? I wanna see if me going 2.5 was worth it or if in the future ditch it for your kit
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2016 | 11:53 PM
  #467  
Wolftrk99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,492
Likes: 48
From: Virginia Beach,VA
Default

Thought they did already, or was that another truck??
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2016 | 09:01 AM
  #468  
Chevy305's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 69
Likes: 3
From: New Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by Speed Engineering
For those that are curious about primary tube sizes, and horse power/torque gains & losses this a really good older thread to read. SBC and LS engines are different birds when it comes to performance gains and exhaust. I wouldn't read too much into dyno results with SBC engines. 1 5/8" use the be the way to go. It is no longer the case with LS engines. Every 1 5/8" header we have had on the dyno usually ends up glowing red from restriction lol.

Stock Motor 1 3/4" Vs. 1 7/8 Engine Dyno Results!! - LS1TECH

Thanks
Sean
Holy crap, quite the controversial thread there
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2016 | 02:01 PM
  #469  
Jaxon2580's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 123
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Wolftrk99
Thought they did already, or was that another truck??
They did the dyno with a cammed 6.0 didn't they? I haven't read through this thread in a while but I think they said they'd put LT and their 3 inch true dual on a stock 5.3 and see if the 3 inch tubes were too big
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2016 | 03:51 PM
  #470  
Wolftrk99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,492
Likes: 48
From: Virginia Beach,VA
Default

The 6.0 they have swapped in i thought was basically a stock lq4, may have read it wrong though
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 PM.