GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

So I went to the dynojet today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 12:20 AM
  #1  
mr03silverado's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Milton WA
Default So I went to the dynojet today

I wanted to get some sort of base before installing the ARH's. I was a little disappointed I have a 2003 rwd 5.3L with Airraid Jr intake, K&N filter, Flowmaster American thunder system, electric fans, and a Diablo "Lew" tune for 92 oct. it was about 80 deg out.

My numbers were 250hp and 287tq

The 2003 I've seen a few posts durning my search where people say that their stock 2003-2005 5.3 put down just a couple of HP less. What do you guys think of those numbers?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 12:44 AM
  #2  
TXsilverado's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,364
Likes: 291
From: Humble Texas
Default

Youre basically stock...good starting point IMO. Dont get tied up in dyno numbers
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 09:16 AM
  #3  
black00chev's Avatar
Slowest turbo build ever!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 1
From: Warrenton, VA
Default

Warm temps, and a Diablo tune, seems about right. With a "real" tune I bet you would see a little bit better numbers, but not much. Like said above, you're still basically stock.

You made it easier for air to get in and get out, but now you need to MOVE more air. Cam swap time!
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 10:09 AM
  #4  
George C....'s Avatar
Formerly ScreamingL
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 5
From: From the 412
Default

Originally Posted by mr03silverado
I wanted to get some sort of base before installing the ARH's. I was a little disappointed I have a 2003 rwd 5.3L with Airraid Jr intake, K&N filter, Flowmaster American thunder system, electric fans, and a Diablo "Lew" tune for 92 oct. it was about 80 deg out.

My numbers were 250hp and 287tq

The 2003 I've seen a few posts durning my search where people say that their stock 2003-2005 5.3 put down just a couple of HP less. What do you guys think of those numbers?
you have a 2003 5.3, they are only 285 crank, which dyno around 225-230 stock range
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 11:39 AM
  #5  
mr03silverado's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Milton WA
Default

Originally Posted by George C....
you have a 2003 5.3, they are only 285 crank, which dyno around 225-230 stock range

That does make me feel better. I'm not too hung up on the dyno numbers, it was mainly to see what the gain is with headers (which I'll be able to report to all of you). I was just a little down when I saw a couple of others say with their "stock" 2003 (and many more miles on the clock) it was in the 240hp range.

Doesn't help that I had a Cobalt SS (turbo) and with about the same money into it (as far as modifications go) and that put 280hp 300tq to the wheels. Stock crank numbers were 260hp 260tq.

Just figured that I'd see somewhere around 285hp with the truck, but really I'm just curious to see what kind of power these headers will truly add.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 01:25 PM
  #6  
George C....'s Avatar
Formerly ScreamingL
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 5
From: From the 412
Default

newer 5.3s only dyno 245 rwhp stock....thats a 9.9cr with 243s and a 90mm intake

after tune it made 265 and they are 310 rated
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 01:43 PM
  #7  
zero2sixT's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 2
From: Deer park, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mr03silverado
Doesn't help that I had a Cobalt SS (turbo) and with about the same money into it (as far as modifications go) and that put 280hp 300tq to the wheels. Stock crank numbers were 260hp 260tq.
Just further proves that boost is the replacement for displacement.

250 to the wheels out of a stock engine with a crappy tune isn't something to be down about. Its a good baseline. Honestly, the stuff you have done aren't power adders. With exception to the diablo tune, which leaves power on the table.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2015 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
bossmancb's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

that is pretty good! my 05 ecsb 4x4 dyno'd 250hp 330tq and I had the airraid jr, afe filter, longtubes w. offroad y to stock exhaust with a flowmaster 10, and a diablew tune on 87 oct. My truck has e-fans stock so I have 30tq and 0hp on you and I have longtubes. You should see a nice bump once you get them installed
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cheyenne383
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
9
Nov 13, 2015 09:24 AM
bearden86
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
25
Nov 1, 2015 07:12 PM
trxmxzx
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
8
Sep 29, 2015 07:42 AM
trxmxzx
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
10
Sep 23, 2015 09:15 PM
TrickTurbo
Sponsor's Announcements, Sales, and Specials
3
Sep 23, 2015 08:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.