GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

So I changed to a bullet...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 03:04 PM
  #1  
BlackPearlZ71's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Mission, Texas
Default So I changed to a bullet...

wats up guys...yesterday i decided to change from my magnaflow single in dual out to a bullet. those puppies work, my previous time was a 13.3 with a 1.89 60ft, now its a 13.3 with a 1.94 60ft. I know my time didnt get better, but I still hit the same time with alot crappier 60ft ...i dont know why my 60s are so crappy.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #2  
ridndirty's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

wait...so do they work or not? haha im confused
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 08:32 PM
  #3  
ReSpAwN DeMoN's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

to me it kinda sounds like your mangaflows worked better?

I'm confusd to!
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #4  
Phantom's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,694
Likes: 50
From: The 405
Default

he's sayin they flow good on the big end i guess
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2007 | 10:57 PM
  #5  
hard2kill's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: rhinebeck ny
Default

sounds like u lost lil down low but made it back up top so its a matter of opion now whatever u like the the sound of best
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 12:31 AM
  #6  
Tootall's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,175
Likes: 1
From: League City, Tx
Default

what about keeping the maggy, and getting a cut out instead
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 01:14 AM
  #7  
RoosterMcCandles's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 0
Default

The differences between the two are more than likely negligble and the difference in time can probably just be contributed to being different runs. That is my two cents anyway...
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2007 | 05:57 AM
  #8  
ranwalk's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 1
From: Pearl, Mississippi
Default

There is not way to determine anyting from the information given. What does the entire time slip look like? Mph, 1/8 mile time and mph. Also, what is the full time?? Was it a 13.3000 or a 13.3999? What were the weather conditions and temp between the two runs? Based on the information given, i'm inclined to say, there is really no difference between the two.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 12:25 AM
  #9  
BlackPearlZ71's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Mission, Texas
Default

well I figured it helped me since I had more traction problems than the times i've ran and still managed similar times, It was a 13.32. The previous times have been mid to high 13.3s My truck feels better flowing, and sounds killer!! u can hear my lope like crazy now,
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tydriver
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
45
Oct 23, 2015 09:19 PM
dantheman1540
FUEL SYSTEMS
8
Sep 15, 2015 08:28 PM
cousblake11
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
0
Sep 9, 2015 06:52 PM
SWINGRRRR
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
5
Sep 3, 2015 07:49 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.