GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Shorties

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 03:12 PM
  #21  
dragonman0325's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

I'm about to install my JBA ceramic titaniums and will post my results, but I live in Md. and don;t have any access to a dyno to get any solid number son gains. I'm also doing intake, Magnaflow exhaust,and vette servo at the same time. Maybe I'm being optimistic but I'm hoping for 25-30 Hp increse with all three mods at once. Next mods are gonan be TB converter and custom tune. It's a dialy driver so I'm not sure I wanna go further than that. Maybe some electric fans and a shift kit.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 03:17 PM
  #22  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

I think the point is not that shorties suck, it's that the engineering of the stock manifolds has improved so much that they rival (or are even equal to) the gains realized by most shorties. Plus, if you go shorties, you sacrifice the heat shields/dissipators that come with the stock manifolds, and end up having to deal with all kinds of other issues related to heat, wires, and such. So the question is, why would you want to do that for questionable (or very little) gains?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 03:41 PM
  #23  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Not to hijack the thread, but does anybody know the difference between the Gibson, Edelbrock, and JBA shorties? I installed my Gibson shorties about 3 years ago at the same time that I did my cat-back and K&N FIPK. Did the K&N one day, shorties the next day, then the cat-back the last day. Wanted to see if I felt a difference with each mod, and I thought I did, but it might have just been that my right foot got real heavy all of a sudden.

Anyway, I installed the Gibson stainless shorties (don't think that they offered coated at the time), and I must say that the quality and fitment is awesome. From what I remember, when I looked at pictures, I couldn't see a difference between the Gibsons, Edelbrocks, and JBA's...they all looked exactly the same. I have heard some folks talk about their Edelbrocks cracking at the flanges though...I problem that I haven't had. So if anyone knows what's different about the 3, I'd love to be educated on it.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 03:45 PM
  #24  
dragonman0325's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

I dunno if it's just marketing hype but JBA claims they're firecone collector technology scavanges more exhaust. Also don;t the ceramic coating help reduce underhood heat? I saw some independant dyno results showing 12hp from the JBA's. I'm not sure I believe it though. I wish I could get to a dyno.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 03:52 PM
  #25  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

Yea, I definitely would have gotten ceramic if I could at the time...I'm sure that it helps the underhood temps somewhat.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 04:12 PM
  #26  
moregrip's Avatar
what a rush!
20 Year Member
Loved
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,629
Likes: 33
From: Wyoming
Default

BlownChevy got 8-10rwhp with his Edelbrock shorties on his old truck.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #27  
dragonman0325's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

So 12 rwhp on the JBA's might be within reason? They have the bigger 15/8 tubes. Also will the ceramic make them cooler than factory manifolds?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #28  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

Originally Posted by dragonman0325
I saw some independant dyno results showing 12hp from the JBA's.
That's a huge gain from shorties...across the power band, or just in a certain area (i.e. up high/down low)? And you say independent dyno results? Remember where?

This would change my view of shorties if this were true.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 05:01 PM
  #29  
dragonman0325's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Default

In another forum I saw a dyno chart from a member who tested them. Now I cannot promise he did'nt do other mods at the same time but according to him it was just the JBA shorties.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 06:26 PM
  #30  
vanillagorilla's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,038
Likes: 1
From: Arizona Bay
Default

It was probably 12 peak hp, but what about torque. I mean we all have trucks here right? I'm sure the hp and tq is up all across the board. But we don't race dynos here.

I don't have any headers, but I have a cam and if I get stupid maybe some nitrous, so I would think that I would gain quite a bit with some shorties. I've been thinking about just buying the cheap *** summit racing ones for like $170 and having them coated. I would think I would gain more than 10hp/tq.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.