Radix & RPMs
#1
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC
Every product made has limits, upper and lower. At what point, in engine RPMs, does the Radix become less efficient from overspin?
And at what RPM for the smaller pulleys?
The reason asked: Suppose you change the cam. The new cam powerband has a higher RPM range. In theory, based on RPMs, you could overspin the blower before you get to the peak HPs of the cam.
It would only matter if the overspin would occur when the engines RPMs were under 7000 RPMs. Not saying I plan on spinning it to 7000 RPMs, but the blower would need to be able to handle that rate at minimum.
And at what RPM for the smaller pulleys?
The reason asked: Suppose you change the cam. The new cam powerband has a higher RPM range. In theory, based on RPMs, you could overspin the blower before you get to the peak HPs of the cam.
It would only matter if the overspin would occur when the engines RPMs were under 7000 RPMs. Not saying I plan on spinning it to 7000 RPMs, but the blower would need to be able to handle that rate at minimum.
#3
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Summerville, SC
I figured it would be well above any RPM I would reach. But wanted to make sure before dropping that amount of cash.
I notice that there are not a lot of head/cam mods with the Radix. Do you think this is strictly because cash flow or is it simply not needed? It is my understanding that the 5.3 heads flow very well and the only change really benefical, from a torque perspective, is increasing the valve sizes.
I notice that there are not a lot of head/cam mods with the Radix. Do you think this is strictly because cash flow or is it simply not needed? It is my understanding that the 5.3 heads flow very well and the only change really benefical, from a torque perspective, is increasing the valve sizes.
#5
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: C.S. TX
The blower would still be good up to 16-17k, but by magnuson's reccomendations you are correct. You could get away with about a 2.9" pulley max if you are spinning to 6500. That would put you at approx 16,800 rpm. Some lightning guys go even over 18000 rpm, and don't grenade their stuff.
#7
If you plan on many upgrade I would to something other then the radix. It is godd even grat to a certian point but will not do well with big cubes or great heads and high RPM's. In other words it cannot supply enough air if going a little overboard is your intention.
Trending Topics
#8
I've been considering a head/cam setup with the Radix, but haven't started really researching yet. I'm curious if the Radix could pull enough air through good flowing heads/moderately aggressive cam. My goal is about 500rwhp, just wondering if I'll have to look into a nitrous setup to get there. (dual power adders, nitrous + blower.....KABLAMO - from personal experience
)
)
#9
Originally Posted by O3GMC
I've been considering a head/cam setup with the Radix, but haven't started really researching yet. I'm curious if the Radix could pull enough air through good flowing heads/moderately aggressive cam. My goal is about 500rwhp, just wondering if I'll have to look into a nitrous setup to get there. (dual power adders, nitrous + blower.....KABLAMO - from personal experience
)
)
#10
Yeah, but that was w/ forged internals and through an M6.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...&highlight=500
500 rwhp on a Radix'd 5.3 would be a feat!
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...&highlight=500
500 rwhp on a Radix'd 5.3 would be a feat!






