GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Ordered thorley's today...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #1  
DamnYankee's Avatar
Thread Starter
formerly Moze (2/24/2012)
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Default Ordered thorley's today...

Anyone else running these? (310-Y)

Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #2  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Why did you go with those instead of true lt headers?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #3  
DamnYankee's Avatar
Thread Starter
formerly Moze (2/24/2012)
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Mesquite, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 1slow01Z71
Why did you go with those instead of true lt headers?
Longtubes give the most gains mid-top end. The Tri-Y design as well as the length of the primaries on these were designed to give great torque (which you lose with LT's) and hp up through the midrange. Top end will be unaffected, but my top end is fine the way it is. Our trucks are heavy...the more torque, the better.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #4  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

I wouldn't be too sure that the length of the primaries were sized to produce the most torque, you'll notice that they fit just perfectly infront of the cats. Take a true 32'' long tube header like the LG Pros for the Corvettes... These bad boys make some torque... On a '01-'04 ZO6 some of the guys are showing a 40TQ gain.

Shorter primaries are usually tuned to make power within a certain range at higher RPM. There are header primary calculators all over the internet.

Now, if the Tri-Y stuff really works... I don't know... If it does make more torque... That's a plus for sure.

BTW, I'm using those headers.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #5  
BlackGMC's Avatar
Resident Retard
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 17,216
Likes: 20
From: Fort Worth - TX
Default

Originally Posted by Moze
Anyone else running these? (310-Y)

How much did you pay for those???
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 06:19 PM
  #6  
formerly silverbrick (changed 02/17/2013)
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Tx
Default

looks like somethig well worth a before and after dyno
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #7  
gonzo 6.2's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 15
From: oregon
Default

Isnt the Tri-Y designed to benifit due to and engineered for the firing order?Look at these and look at the old SBC tri-Ys the old engine has a different firing order does this Y differnt than the old pipes?
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #8  
shandy294's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: Cibolo Tx
Default

They are a follow-the-firing-order,almost-true 180 degree header from what I've heard/read. They are supposed to give better torque gain than a non tri-y header of the same length. I read that they were designed for trucks and motor homes to give them some extra pull.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 10:01 PM
  #9  
budhayes3's Avatar
PT's Slowest Truck
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 17,863
Likes: 2
From: Hackensack, NJ
Default

I think slowprocess has those on his 6.0 also...
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #10  
Moddoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 880
Likes: 1
From: Forest Lake, MN
Default

Damn those are

J/K

I'm sure they will be a nice addition to the truck.

The truth is, noone has any dyno info at 2000rpm for these different headers.
The only pacesetter dyno with 2000 rpm I've seen is from a LS1 and the torque was exactly the same as stock. Then again, who knows how well these are tuned before and after.
We need a decent comparison and dyno results at low rpm.

I just got my pacesetters from jethot today.
I may dyno it after they are on, but won't be able to get a before dyno to compare.

I can't believe it's taken 7 years to get as little decent header info as we have.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:26 AM.