GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

One of the dumbest thing I've ever tried (and it worked).

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 11:19 PM
  #1  
treyZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, North Mexico
Default One of the dumbest thing I've ever tried (and it worked).

I just posed this of the fullsize boards, but figured you guys might want to see it

I'm driving home at about 70mph trying to save gas. see how well i can do.
I took the mud terrains off and put them in the bed, threw the brush guard in the bed- got some Highway Terrain style 265/70/17 wheel/tire package. Also put the lower air valence on.

Ohh i go. Sweet,gas milage is worse than when i had a brush guard, no air valence, on MTs and the whole 9 yards. 15.8 mpg. what the ****.

After 2 stops for gas, i said "**** this" and decided to forget the mpg record and shoot for a land speed record. Before going out, I pulled some old motorsports style tricks. I taped up the body gaps, radiator etc. The gaps between the grille, lights, hood, slits in bumper, fog lights, tow hooks. Pulled it up to 80mph and even faster- as high as 110. 17+mpg.

one thing to add: the 17mph range was DEFINATELY the most mountainous

i'm wondering if the 400lbs in the bed (4 tires and wheels and a brush guard) messed up air flow and weighed the rear down too much. I had another 300lbs or so in the cab too.

All I know is i'm driving back at 85mph. I'm leaving the wheels, tires and brush guard at home (not sure about brush guard). We'll see what happens.
I think the gears are just too tall for the 6.0. But the escalade has the same tires, gears, engine etc. I'm also going to put the skid plates back on.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 12:58 AM
  #2  
1slow01Z71's Avatar
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 4
From: Austin, TX
Default

Thats wierd for sure guess its the gears liek you are talking about cant think of anything else. With the 5.3 runnin 85-90 from northern AL to Houston I would get get close to 15mpg on 32" all terrains so IDK.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 02:06 AM
  #3  
TurboGibbs's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,257
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, AL
Default

I bet it is the extra weight.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 06:59 AM
  #4  
Nigel215's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

I would say it was the extra weight. I know just by putting a few CMU blocks in my bed when it snows for soem traction, my MPG will drop a good bit.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 10:21 AM
  #5  
Zick's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default

Did you reprogram the pcm for the different size tires cause that will throw your mileage off.
Also, how are you calculating mileage(by miles per tank, or by the digital readout)?
Either way they will be off if your pcm was not corrected.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #6  
treyZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, North Mexico
Default

I corrected for milage, good tought though.

Last edited by treyZ28; Dec 9, 2005 at 01:07 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #7  
mwalls54's Avatar
Need More N2O Mod
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 0
From: Not in Koonerville MD anymore
Default

going with a larger tire will so to speak change your gear ratio to a higher gear. There is a formula to figure it out but I cant find it any where.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 12:54 AM
  #8  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

alot of that can be in your tuning though. most milage comes from the tune.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #9  
mwalls54's Avatar
Need More N2O Mod
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,382
Likes: 0
From: Not in Koonerville MD anymore
Default

(Original Tire Diameter / New Tire Diameter) X Original Axle Ratio = Effective Axle Ratio


ok lets say you were running the stock 265 = 30.6 and your mud tires are 305 = 32.8 . I am asumming you have 3.73 gears

30.6/32.8 x 3.73 = 3.479
with 3.479 being your ratio means with the mud tires on your truck would be running a lower rpm at higher speeds which would be better gas milage.

When people put lifts on their trucks and larger tires they ususally change the gears ratio to gain back the power they loose because of larger tires.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #10  
treyZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, North Mexico
Default

Originally Posted by mwalls54
(Original Tire Diameter / New Tire Diameter) X Original Axle Ratio = Effective Axle Ratio


ok lets say you were running the stock 265 = 30.6 and your mud tires are 305 = 32.8 . I am asumming you have 3.73 gears

30.6/32.8 x 3.73 = 3.479
with 3.479 being your ratio means with the mud tires on your truck would be running a lower rpm at higher speeds which would be better gas milage.

When people put lifts on their trucks and larger tires they ususally change the gears ratio to gain back the power they loose because of larger tires.
dude, I even made it bold. I corrected for that and already said that. Believe me, I understand how it works. 112credits deep into a mechanical engineering degree

besides, an uncorrected smaller tire would give false readings that are too high, not too low
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 PM.