GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 11:29 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
From: Clyde, California
Default No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

Here's a link to a previous post about putting an OEM Tahoe muffler and tailpipe on my Silverado.
https://ls1tech.com/ubb/ultimatebb.p...;f=18;t=002402
The truck now has 200 miles on the new exhaust and I've had ZERO performance loss. I've done several 0-60 runs on the old stop watch and the times are the same. I had a Flowmaster 70 Series with dual 2.25" tailpipes before and now it's an OEM Tahoe muffler and 3" tailpipe. The truck feels like it has more low end and drives better around town. It's wierd not having an exhaust note to listen to but I don't miss the interior resonation at all.
Jim
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:38 PM
  #2  
CHAGO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 0
From: Northwest Houston
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

so maybe flowmaster is just for sound?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:45 PM
  #3  
red53gmc's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

Flowmasters are the worst flowing muffler out there. Obviously no better than the OEM stuff, just louder.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 01:51 PM
  #4  
RED2K's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: fayetteville AR
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

red53gmc... your full of <img border="0" alt="[bullshit]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_bs.gif" />
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 03:36 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: C.S. TX
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

Flowmasters on f-body's don't help at all. Some guys who keep stock pipes, and go with a flowmaster muffler actually lose Hp. If you go with their full 3" catback, then they help some.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 03:49 PM
  #6  
Brandon Boomhauer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,768
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Denton TX
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

if they suck, then are they sold and used on tons of cars. people with dragcars that use exhaust use them. hell they are probably the best selling muffler out there, why would someone buy one if it didnt perform better?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 04:40 PM
  #7  
JWRENCH's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: CLARKSVILLE,TN
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

Flowmasters are like fram oil filters. Everybody buys them, but they ain't worth two cents... People should do a little research instead of listening to salesmen.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 05:04 PM
  #8  
CHAGO's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 0
From: Northwest Houston
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

Hey, I didn't know Brandon worked for Flowmaster now!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 08:56 PM
  #9  
tbyrne's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,642
Likes: 0
From: Mass
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Flowmasters on f-body's don't help at all. Some guys who keep stock pipes, and go with a flowmaster muffler actually lose Hp. If you go with their full 3" catback, then they help some. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I've seen and heard the same thing...
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2002 | 08:59 PM
  #10  
BigTex's Avatar
? ? ? ? ? ?
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,126
Likes: 2
From: East of Dallas
Default Re: No performance loss after going back to stock muffler.

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Brandon:
<strong>if they suck, then are they sold and used on tons of cars. people with dragcars that use exhaust use them. hell they are probably the best selling muffler out there, why would someone buy one if it didnt perform better?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well, they sound real good. Most folks who take their vehicles down to the local muffler shop don't really know about performance. They like the sound.

I had a flomaster first and gained about 10% gas mileage over the stock muffler.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM.