GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

New Track Times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2005 | 11:50 PM
  #11  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by KySilverado
Thanks. Feels good. I'll be content with 13.5's for awhile Small stall and some lowend tuning for it should pull down my 60' times another .1 or so then BlownChevy won't be ribbing me about them. Think I can still manage to keep a truck if I go with the right stall rpm. Thinking 2400 brake stall to get in the boost a bit more so long as it doesn't flash badly. Definately going with PI.

LOL no ribbin!! Just know when you get them down the ET will drop too.

I am sure when I go to the track my 60s will be ****.
Reply
Old May 27, 2005 | 11:53 PM
  #12  
Mr. Sandog's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,632
Likes: 2
From: Sun Diego
Default

Originally Posted by KySilverado
Thanks. Feels good. I'll be content with 13.5's for awhile Small stall and some lowend tuning for it should pull down my 60' times another .1 or so then BlownChevy won't be ribbing me about them. Think I can still manage to keep a truck if I go with the right stall rpm. Thinking 2400 brake stall to get in the boost a bit more so long as it doesn't flash badly. Definately going with PI.
Keep me posted on the stall. What has kept me away from them is the looseness some of them have....if I could find a tight one that drove like stock (except when I got on it), I'd be sold.

The Yank TT2600 was going to be my choice for a while until they started having all kinds of QC and customer service problems. Now their TT2600 only has a 90-day warranty, so I'm definitely staying away.
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 12:09 AM
  #13  
KySilverado's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 7
From: Central Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
I wonder how it compares to the GT II-3
Can't lay my hands on the GT-3 specs. Real close to the GT-2 except the ground in advance. I did loose 2-3 psi of boost with it which I will now have to get back.
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #14  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

INT EXH
Adv Dur 255 281
Dur @ .050 207 220
Valve Lift .571 .578

Lobe Sep 118.5
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #15  
KySilverado's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 7
From: Central Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by Naked AV
Yep, every one is slightly different.

Gotta love that torque out of the hole, eh?
Yah, little flick of the throttle and off you go.... making little squeal noises.
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 12:25 AM
  #16  
KySilverado's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,446
Likes: 7
From: Central Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by BlownChevy
INT EXH
Adv Dur 255 281
Dur @ .050 207 220
Valve Lift .571 .578

Lobe Sep 118.5
Your 60' times are really gonna suck Bet it idles great and suspect you lost a bit of boost also?
Reply
Old May 28, 2005 | 12:27 AM
  #17  
BlownChevy's Avatar
blownerator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 1986
Posts: 18,748
Likes: 7
From: Chatsworth, CA
Default

Originally Posted by KySilverado
Your 60' times are really gonna suck Bet it idles great and suspect you lost a bit of boost also?

Did not lose any boost. I did add the 3.2 the next day though
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ARC
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
57
Feb 21, 2022 10:54 AM
GMCtrk
FORCED INDUCTION
67
Jul 17, 2015 06:39 PM
GRRR65GTO
INTERNAL ENGINE MODIFICATIONS
2
Jul 10, 2015 08:27 PM
coryhussey
GMT 800 & Older GM General Discussion
0
Jul 6, 2015 10:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 AM.