new best!!! but i still get to keep my name :-)
Apr 6, 2002 | 02:43 PM
#1
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: north dallas
Re: new best!!! but i still get to keep my name :-)
oh yah, they had a jeep wrangler with a vette ls1 in it as well. ran a 13.9 launching in 2wd!!! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
Apr 6, 2002 | 04:10 PM
#2
TECH Addict
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
From: as far away from Koonerville as humanly possible
Re: new best!!! but i still get to keep my name :-)
Dammit, I gotta pull 3 tenths out of my *** to catch up to you now. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Nice run. I had heard a rumor or two about a LS1 Jeep, but thought it was just a fairy tale. Pretty sweet!
Nice run. I had heard a rumor or two about a LS1 Jeep, but thought it was just a fairy tale. Pretty sweet!
Apr 6, 2002 | 06:39 PM
#3
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: north dallas
Re: new best!!! but i still get to keep my name :-)
haha, damn neil u better hurry! too bad u dont have those pulleys, i have them sitting in reserves just incase some huge truck starts getting as fast as me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />
oh yeah.... im sure ryan can vouch that it was no lie <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> (he found out twice in a row heh)
<small>[ April 06, 2002, 06:40 PM: Message edited by: really slow truck ]</small>
oh yeah.... im sure ryan can vouch that it was no lie <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> (he found out twice in a row heh)
<small>[ April 06, 2002, 06:40 PM: Message edited by: really slow truck ]</small>
Apr 7, 2002 | 12:10 AM
#4
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: north dallas
new best!!! but i still get to keep my name :-)
took the truck out to ennis last night to see what it would run now compared to my 15.96@89.27 from last time
changes were ls1 edit, turned off and unplugged the egr (part of edit)
I also removed my spare tire and tools (thought that would weigh more but prob 100lbs total)
best time i got tonight was a 15.784 @ 89.12, but... my 60ft was 2/10ths better this time so im not really sure if ls1 edit helped too much.
do any of you guys know how much of a difference a DA in the -600s(last time) vs. a DA in the 700s (this time) can make?
either way ls1 edit is going to help more and more as i do more to the truck so its cool <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
bryan
<small>[ April 06, 2002, 12:10 PM: Message edited by: really slow truck ]</small>
changes were ls1 edit, turned off and unplugged the egr (part of edit)
I also removed my spare tire and tools (thought that would weigh more but prob 100lbs total)
best time i got tonight was a 15.784 @ 89.12, but... my 60ft was 2/10ths better this time so im not really sure if ls1 edit helped too much.
do any of you guys know how much of a difference a DA in the -600s(last time) vs. a DA in the 700s (this time) can make?
either way ls1 edit is going to help more and more as i do more to the truck so its cool <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
bryan
<small>[ April 06, 2002, 12:10 PM: Message edited by: really slow truck ]</small>
Apr 8, 2002 | 12:02 AM
#6
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: fort worth, TX
Re: new best!!! but i still get to keep my name :-)
yeah that jeep was damn fast. the drivers side tire came off the ground from the 1-2 shift. cool thing is that it looked completly stock except for a little 5.7L sticker on the side.
Trending Topics
Apr 8, 2002 | 02:07 AM
#8
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Re: new best!!! but i still get to keep my name :-)
i just ran a 16.1 @ 87 with intake/exhaust/hpp3 (not cam yet, still waiting on andy to be free) and i didnt get to spray.
this is with 33's and no weight reduction. i was pretty dissapointed at the results, but i guess this is expected for an extended cab Z71
this is with 33's and no weight reduction. i was pretty dissapointed at the results, but i guess this is expected for an extended cab Z71