GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

Milling 5.3 heads and LQ4 Questions!!!

Old May 6, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Default Milling 5.3 heads and LQ4 Questions!!!

Anyone have any numbers with a 6.0 with milled 5.3 heads??? Just wanting a little more and have been thinking of this. Wanting to mill a set and stick on there. Let me know if anyone has anything...
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 05:59 PM
  #2  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,690
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Default

Milling to achieve what CR? I'd think that going to the 5.3 head would be a downgrade (unless ported too?)
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #3  
Low_LSX's Avatar
Formerly Low_LQ4 - 6/6/10
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 0
From: Kuwait
Default

Originally Posted by trever1t
Milling to achieve what CR? I'd think that going to the 5.3 head would be a downgrade (unless ported too?)
Also you will have to get bigger valve's to make it work.
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #4  
53bowtie's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 14
From: Detroit, MI
Default

x3

If you are going to go with 5.3 heads you need to get 2.0 intake valves istalled and have them ported and polished to get them up to par with 243's and 317's flow numbers. If you dont do this the bump in compression will be canceled out with the poor flow numbers for that many cubes. Just my 2 cents.
Reply
Old May 6, 2009 | 09:16 PM
  #5  
Mangled03gmc's Avatar
Baltimore Whore
20 Year Member
iTrader: (95)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,820
Likes: 2
From: In a van DOWN BY THE RIVER
Default

You would need valve work, valves to be a decent upgrade on the 5.3's If you want comp slap a set of ls-6 heads on there. They flow just as well as the 317 heads..
Reply
Old May 8, 2009 | 05:09 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Default

They would definately have bigger valves, be ported, and I'm wanting to have about 11.0-11.5 CR. Valves would be about the same size as on my 6.0. 2.02" intake and 1.55" exhaust.
Reply
Old May 8, 2009 | 05:10 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Default

Sorry. I should have been more specific.
Reply
Old May 8, 2009 | 05:21 PM
  #8  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

just my opinion here, I would never go over 11:1 on a street truck. It's really not worth the minimal gains to always have to be worrying about getting good gas.
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 05:55 PM
  #9  
Low_LSX's Avatar
Formerly Low_LQ4 - 6/6/10
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 0
From: Kuwait
Default

Go with LS6 heads 243, 799 IMO.
Reply
Old May 9, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #10  
skeet's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 2
From: P.A. TX
Default

Originally Posted by Jtbrewer19
They would definately have bigger valves, be ported, and I'm wanting to have about 11.0-11.5 CR. Valves would be about the same size as on my 6.0. 2.02" intake and 1.55" exhaust.

if youre running a lq9 motor do NOT mill the heads, it will bump your cr way to high just go with a stock gasket, i ran a set of patriot 2.5 heads with 2.02 valves and put down 400+ hp. the cr was close to 12. somewhere around 11.5:1 if youre using a lq4 i would think the cr would be less but wouldnt mill them neither just use a thinner gasket to achieve the cr.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.