GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

mileage experiment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #11  
Thread Starter
formerly silverbrick (changed 02/17/2013)
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Tx
Default

do you think your instant MPG measures increased drag? instantaneously? seems like the drag factor wouldnt be immediate but would contribute over a long period of time.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 07:40 PM
  #12  
Zick's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by Soon2bSpooled
do you think your instant MPG measures increased drag? instantaneously? seems like the drag factor wouldnt be immediate but would contribute over a long period of time.

It will guage drag instantly. On the hwy if I duck behind a semi it will jump right up and if I pull out from behind it goes right down.
Thats the whole point behind the instand mpg to see what your getting at that point in time. I think your thinking about the average mpg read out which wouldn't show until a long period of time.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 07:45 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
formerly silverbrick (changed 02/17/2013)
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Tx
Default

no i have never dealt with any of these indicators, on my 00, there isnt any of that other fancy computer information center stuff. so i know nothing about it. cool feature though. ill be posting up my findings when i fill
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #14  
nonnieselman's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 2
From: Crystal Springs, MS
Default

i think the mythbuster had 2 explorers or expeditions for the A/C test on the circle track.

Wonder why they always test the fords??

hahah
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 09:03 PM
  #15  
Bo185's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Beebe, Arkansas
Default

I would wash and wax the truck thats good for at least .74635295211333 MPG.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #16  
BADMOFO's Avatar
Cuz I AM a BADMOFO
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,624,039
Likes: 0
From: Mission to Uranus
Default

I stopped worrying about my mileage when I realized that I wasn't gonna get rid of my truck or drive it any differently! It sucks, but thats the way it is for me. Unless gas gets really outrageous, I'm gonna ride on!
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 09:29 PM
  #17  
endo's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default

Mythbusters DID NOT bust those "myths." This particular episode of Mythbusters is why a no longer watch Mythbusters.

Their test was to run two identical Ford Explorereditions around a test track with the following three conditions:

1. Windows UP, A/C ON.
2. Windows UP, A/C OFF.
3. Windows DOWN, A/C OFF.

The first three tests were done with Ford engineers with a scan tool calculating mileage off the MAF. They drove the test circuit at 55mph for several laps and recorded the following (I'm making up numbers, because I don't remember the exact figures...but these are close enough):

* Windows UP, A/C ON: 14MPG
* Windows UP, A/C OFF: 14MPG
* Windows DOWN, A/C OFF :13MPG

That was at 55MPH.

The track safety official was petrified seeing the Exploreditions on Firecrap tires circling the track at 55MPH. The tires were getting hot and being torn up.

The Mythbusters second test was going to be to run configurations #1 and #3 in two different trucks and see which ran out of fuel first. The track official said NO, you're not going to drive those trucks for x hundred miles at 55mph, you're going to blow a tire before you finish.

So the Mythbusters siphoned all the fuel out of the tanks, and added 5 gal to each. Then they agreed to conduct this second test at 35MPH. A/C on ran out of fuel first at the slower speed. "Myth busted" because they felt the results of the second test were more "real world" or some BS like that.

Morons.

Drag = 1/2 rho v^2 * Cd * SA

rho is air density
Cd is coefficient of drag
SA is the reference surface area for the drag coeff
v is velocity

v^2 @ 35mph 35*35 = 1225.
v^2 @ 55mph is 55*55 = 3025.

So at 55mph there is 2.5x as much aerodynamic drag as there is at 35mph. Aero drag is only one part of vehicle efficiency. At 35mph, the drag resulting from the decreased aerodynamics of having the window down was less than the parasitic loss of turning the AC compressor. At 55mph, it was the other way around.

The mythbusters did not discuss any of the above. They didn't think seem to the speed difference mattered. It was just "myth busted" and that was that.

As far as the tailgate up and down....the tailgate up should work better as believe it actually reduces the net drag on the truck. A boundary layer forms in the bed. There's basicly a layer a stagnant air sitting in the bed, acting like a "virtual" bed cover. So you're not actually seeing as much drag as you might think from the tailgate and such. With the tailgate down, that boundary layer goes away, and you get increased drag from the huge drop off after the back wall of the cab. Some university in Mich or MIT did a study on this with a real truck.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 10:41 PM
  #18  
Keith's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
From: Mefis
Default

Did you write in to tell them that?
They do "revisits" on certain episodes where enough viewers write in.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 11:08 PM
  #19  
brodystruck's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by endo
As far as the tailgate up and down....the tailgate up should work better as believe it actually reduces the net drag on the truck. A boundary layer forms in the bed. There's basicly a layer a stagnant air sitting in the bed, acting like a "virtual" bed cover. So you're not actually seeing as much drag as you might think from the tailgate and such. With the tailgate down, that boundary layer goes away, and you get increased drag from the huge drop off after the back wall of the cab. Some university in Mich or MIT did a study on this with a real truck.
I'm not calling you or your information wrong, I'm just wondering why it's the opposite for me...
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
formerly silverbrick (changed 02/17/2013)
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,525
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Tx
Default

im suire there are a plethora of factors that could explain, i wasnt going to touch the tailgate test really until i decided what the hell because the news paper already did a test on it and it made great sense , its like watching an empty coke can in the bed of your truck, doesnt usually fly out, just kinda floats around, sure as hell not going 70mph...im glad this has sparked some interest though
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SloSVO
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
9
Nov 22, 2020 07:34 PM
Gadgetized
FORCED INDUCTION
39
Oct 22, 2015 09:06 AM
SlvrSierra4.8
GM Parts Classifieds
7
Oct 1, 2015 09:39 PM
redbird555
GM Parts Classifieds
2
Sep 30, 2015 09:28 AM
OHsixLS3
Sponsor Feedback
8
Sep 25, 2015 04:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.