GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

LQ4 6.0 + 5.3L heads =

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2005 | 01:28 PM
  #21  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

Originally Posted by 12sec.5.3
I didn't rip you off. When I sold them to you the going rate was at ~$200. Just like Randy said, that's how much I bought mine for. I'm not one to screw anyone so please don't try to give me a bad name.
Todd,

That's what the little winking smiley face is there for at the header. We made that transaction over 8 months ago, I do believe. I was just messing around.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 01:51 PM
  #22  
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, Il
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
with the exception of the intake valve i don't believe there is any real change the the port causing a restriction. if you check around you'll find the 5.3 heads are a pretty good gain on the 5.7L applications. i think a 5.3L head on a 6.0L with the correct intake valve machined in would make more power than the 6.0L head let alone with some port work. it's not worth it as a straight forward swap, but well worth it with some minor work.
The 6.0 heads have LS6 style ports, so they outflow the 5.3 heads by quite a bit. They are a good gain on a 5.7 because the 5.3 has the same ports but smaller chamber. I would say the best benefit would be some worked 6.o heads (milled, ported, etc).
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #23  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

here's some good reading on the subject. Link
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 02:51 PM
  #24  
Sport Side's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Cool

Give me a break. TEA shouldn't be the one asking questions.

Does cross sectional area have anything to do with performance... They don't know this yet?

Try reading the following link. That attempt to knock AFRs small, efficient ports is not worth your time. A shitload of various dynos proves what?
Quality of air

This isn't aimed at you Zippy but, this is just another reason why flow numbers; like dyno numbers, don't mean ****.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 03:44 PM
  #25  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

i wouldn't dare compare an AFR head to a stock ported anything gm head. my point is that the 5.3L head with some mild work puts down nice numbers for the price and can be a gain over stock 6.0L heads. when you're scrolling through look at the track times as well as dyno numbers. at this point your best bet would be L33 heads if you could find them for anywhere near the same price.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 09:10 PM
  #26  
99Silver6.0's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 1
From: Olathe, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by zippy
with the exception of the intake valve i don't believe there is any real change the the port causing a restriction. if you check around you'll find the 5.3 heads are a pretty good gain on the 5.7L applications. i think a 5.3L head on a 6.0L with the correct intake valve machined in would make more power than the 6.0L head let alone with some port work. it's not worth it as a straight forward swap, but well worth it with some minor work.
I was just refering to stock heads. I wouldnt doubt a nicely done set of 5.3 heads would be nice. But not stockers on a 6.0.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 10:33 PM
  #27  
zippy's Avatar
TECH Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,534
Likes: 3
From: Las Vegas, NV
Default

Originally Posted by 99Silver5.3
I was just refering to stock heads. I wouldnt doubt a nicely done set of 5.3 heads would be nice. But not stockers on a 6.0.

ok, i see your point fully now. i agree with you. if i were going to go through all the trouble to swap heads i sure wouldn't put 5.3 heads on in stock form. they would lose power i think over the 6.0L head.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 10:46 PM
  #28  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

On a 6.0 motor Im left wondering which set of heads would produce more. Obviously 6.0 would be better for FI but say an NA setup with a set of stage 3 5.3 heads with larger valves I think with the increased velocity would overcome the 6.0 heads ability to flow slightly higher numbers.

Deckhand I think a set of stage 3 5.3 heads on a 6.0 would perform well in an NA setup.
I would just get ready for alot of tuning the air would be acting competlely different. Im just now getting my ve table and lt/stft's dialed in with the modifications Ive made to my heads and intake taken me 2 weeks to learn it and get it right.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 10:54 PM
  #29  
99Silver6.0's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,039
Likes: 1
From: Olathe, Kansas
Default

Originally Posted by 02sierraz71_5.3
I would just get ready for alot of tuning the air would be acting competlely different. Im just now getting my ve table and lt/stft's dialed in with the modifications Ive made to my heads and intake taken me 2 weeks to learn it and get it right.
Thats the part that sucks right there!!! The tuning is the fun part.
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 11:13 PM
  #30  
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 1
From: Cornelius, NC
Default

Originally Posted by 99Silver5.3
Thats the part that sucks right there!!! The tuning is the fun part.
You can say that again Ive been obsesed with HP tuners ever since I got it, I love it and I hate it.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.