Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

low-end torque+ LSx motor, is it possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2009, 10:57 AM
  #51  
PSM
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

To add more to this thread... I've been reading a lot on ls1 tech and if you want to spend the money.. get a set of afr 205 heads and have them ported by Tony Mamo from AFR. All the reviews say it gives the motor amazing low end and throttle response. The intake ports are smaller than the stock 317 (205 vs 210 I believe) and they flow much more. That means huge port velocity, which means tq!
Old 04-21-2009, 09:39 AM
  #52  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Fe New Mexico
Posts: 1,723
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Now we're geting somewhere....................
Old 04-21-2009, 04:22 PM
  #53  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
TURBHOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i guess i don't get it. did the old small blocks really have that much down low or did it just seem like it because it fell on its face so soon? has anybody ever dyno'd a newer and old truck stock for stock and see how the low end torque compared. it seems to me it may be similar but not feel like it because the 5.3 keeps going and feels better and better as it goes. i know mine has great low end and pulls fine. i have a buddy that pulled horses with his 1500 silverado 5.3. he had a cummins for doing this on normal basis but towed with the 5.3 when he needed to. granite i have a sc3200 from yank now but when it locks up its great. i went to the sc3200 from a tt3000. the tt300 was just too loose and felt like crap down low. felt like i had no power unless i had over 1/2 throttle. with the tight converter it feels way better. i was driving through mountains in Tennessee and the thing never down shifted and the tcc never unlocked. pulled them no problem. 35-40% throttle. i logged it.

but maybe its just me.


fond a site with some ls1 lt1 lt4 dyno's. stock for stock it doesn't look too much different in the down low area.

http://www.lt1.net/dyno.htm

Last edited by 4.8T; 04-21-2009 at 05:03 PM.
Old 04-21-2009, 09:16 PM
  #54  
PSM
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

What you are not seeing is the 0-2000 rpms where the older motors still had killer tq. Also the smaller intake runners meant part throttle tq was way up
Old 04-21-2009, 10:50 PM
  #55  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Fe New Mexico
Posts: 1,723
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

We gotta take the runners down to 185cc pr 180, even. Gotta weld up material in the port then smooth it out.................
Old 04-22-2009, 12:38 AM
  #56  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (11)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lubbock Texas
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have great low end torque on my truck. hell, part throttle and I cant keep it stuck from a stop, on 34" all terrains.

thats what i call great low end tq to me. Im probably about to lose that with the new setup, but I'll gain much more all over the rest of the powerband.
Old 04-22-2009, 05:10 AM
  #57  
PSM
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
PSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 2001c3driver
We gotta take the runners down to 185cc pr 180, even. Gotta weld up material in the port then smooth it out.................
My first thought was because of the bore/strokecombo... but the 5.3/6.0 has a longer stroke than the 350. That really leads me to believe its in the heads
Old 04-22-2009, 09:33 AM
  #58  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Fe New Mexico
Posts: 1,723
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

The only answer is more cubes and/ or lower ring and pinions...........
Old 04-22-2009, 11:16 AM
  #59  
12 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (4)
 
TURBHOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 6,318
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

smaller runners as in shorter or thinner? 0-1500/1800 shouldn't matter stock stall does 1500-1800 does it not?
Old 04-22-2009, 11:30 AM
  #60  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Mark Johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Fe New Mexico
Posts: 1,723
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Thinner. BTW, which are the best 5.3 heads; 706, 852 or 862..............


Quick Reply: low-end torque+ LSx motor, is it possible?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.