GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

low-end torque+ LSx motor, is it possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 12:47 AM
  #31  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Back to the OP...if I were gonna built a gas motor tow rig, I'd do a higher compression stroker motor with a small torquey cam, keep that 4L60E, set the shift points really low, do something like 4.10's in the rear, and possibly run a small blower like a 112 with low boost, 4-5 psi. That would probably pull pretty good. Just my own personal opinion.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 12:57 AM
  #32  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by thunder550
For towing, even my 403 is lacking N/A and with the turbo. I'm hoping that I have some great throttle response once I put the 2300 on it...but I've been disappointed with it's towing ability in all forms that I've had the truck through so far. In all honesty, the 5.3/4L60E/Radix was probably the best setup I've had so far for towing. The 4L80E that I had with the 6.0/Radix setup ate up all the low end torque.

And yes, I've driven a GTO. They have a completely different feeling to them than the trucks do.
I'm seriously fed up with my quest for low end and throttle response. I've always wondered how much better it is even in a stock 3200lb corvette. Hell, I was even driving a 1998 ford escort ZX2 and it simply goes effortlessly on the highway. Sure, it won't even come close to what my truck will do at WOT, but man, this weight is just killer. The scary thing is I'm about to be swapping in a 4l80e
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 01:01 AM
  #33  
thunder550's Avatar
High on diesel fumes
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,658
Likes: 3
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

It's tough to get the weight moving. The GTO has fantastic throttle response...I don't know if it's the combination of gears and tire size, or the transmission gearing, or just the slightly lower weight, or what.....the truck has never been anywhere close.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 06:49 AM
  #34  
NateZQ8's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by thunder550

And yes, I've driven a GTO. They have a completely different feeling to them than the trucks do.
I really can't compare stock to stock auto to auto on the GTO vs TRUCK, but with 3:42 gears and the 5.3 on my work truck, I would honestly say my 4.2L I6 with 3.73 geared Envoy pulls the enclosed trailer better and smoother. It could just be the gearing.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 10:48 AM
  #35  
Mark Johnson's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 29
From: Santa Fe New Mexico
Default

TO throw another wrench in here with y'all. I used to swear by my iron headed LT1, but after some tuning and doing away with torque management I'm starting to think differently. Yes- when folks would go on and on about how the LS1 was manna from Heaven I would think," what are you people smoking"? Now I just can't wait to see where I'll be with my Tran Go kit, then a cam. No- not loopking to win stoplight drag races but it feels good to have the toque under the hood to keep that mass moving down the highway effortlessly..............
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #36  
Mighty Whitey's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
From: Catlettsburg, Ky
Default

my '94 z-71 with the stock TBI 350 seems to get a load moving a little easier than my '02 5.3 truck.
both have LT's, both have been tuned, both have 285's, and the '94 even has 3.42's compared to the '02's 3.73's.

I've really got the wrong 2 setups for trucks: a RCSB TBI 350 truck, and an ECSB 5.3 truck. if the '94 was ECSB, and the '02 was RCSB, I'd hook every trailer I could to the '94 and drag it up and down the hills here in kentucky all day long, and raise hell in the '02.

thanks for your responses!
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #37  
BlownHD's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Default

Mighty Whitey, what size are you long tubes, a 1-5/8 or 1-3/4 primaries, and a 2-1/2 collector is what is going to give you the most down low power, if you have anything bigger than that, you might want to think about swapping them out.

If I were you I would look at a cam over maggie, unless you want a lot more power, and to spend a lot more money. While my truck rips up top, I still need to be above 2500rpm before it really starts to pull.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 07:17 PM
  #38  
PSM's Avatar
PSM
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: New Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by BlownHD
Mighty Whitey, what size are you long tubes, a 1-5/8 or 1-3/4 primaries, and a 2-1/2 collector is what is going to give you the most down low power, if you have anything bigger than that, you might want to think about swapping them out.

If I were you I would look at a cam over maggie, unless you want a lot more power, and to spend a lot more money. While my truck rips up top, I still need to be above 2500rpm before it really starts to pull.
My truck is the same... under 2500 it jsut sucks down more fuel and doesn't move any faster. I need to adjust the shifting because when towing it in OD it goes into boost and has the power, but when it does down shift rpms jump to 3500(and full boost) and the truck screams forward so it then upshifts about a second later.. rather anoying
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #39  
BlownHD's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by PSM
My truck is the same... under 2500 it jsut sucks down more fuel and doesn't move any faster. I need to adjust the shifting because when towing it in OD it goes into boost and has the power, but when it does down shift rpms jump to 3500(and full boost) and the truck screams forward so it then upshifts about a second later.. rather anoying
Thats where a manual trans comes in handy, I can just leave it in whatever gear I want, but I do run into the same problems, lugging in 4th or having the motor scream needlessly in 3rd, chugging down gas
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 07:38 PM
  #40  
BlownHD's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 290
Likes: 1
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by NateZQ8
Wow........Car, truck, minivan, suburban, its all about a flat line under the curve. Which LS engines actually do pretty well. They just are designed to rev higher and make "peak" TQ higher in the band, often times higher than old SBC's would even turn in stock form


Dont know much about GTO's huh? My little "Car" weighs 3800 lbs, pretty close (4-500 lbs) to a STD 1500 cab pickup. My demands on my car's drivetrain are actually similar to a truck where as a vette weighs in at 3100-3200 lbs
Sorry to drag this on, but I just feel the need to clarify some things.

Were talking about an ECSB 4x4 that weighs in around 5000lb and on top of that we are adding a trailer of probably similar weight.

For you to get an adequate comparison of what i'm talking about on my truck or his you would need some 31" tires for your 3.73 gears, extra parasitic loss for a heavier drive train, and then add 2700lbs of weight in your trunk to make your car weigh about the same as my truck with a driver in it....On top of all of that add another 3300lb to your vehicle which is the payload of a 2500hd and that gets regularly exceeded, or add a 10,000lb trailer which is the trailer capacity. Once you have done all of that and then drove around town and on the interstate up and down hills will you realize that 400ftlbs at 4400rpm is actually quite a useless number.


And no the GEN I motor is not some sacred cow, it just makes a damn good truck motor.

Cheers
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.