Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Little Bro' 5.3L project in Car Craft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2004, 10:58 AM
  #1  
Restricted User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Little Bro' 5.3L project in Car Craft

Anyone else see this article?

LPE tuned 5.3L "cranks" out 458 hp (at the crank).
- 1 3/4" headers
- LPE hyd. roller cam .631/.631
- LPE CNC ported heads ( $1,595.00)
- 30lb/hr fuel injectors
- Comp Cams LSX intake ($800.00)

458hp/392tq ...at the crank.
Old 10-03-2004, 01:28 PM
  #2  
Teching In
 
nitrorbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: westwood nj
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yea i got both articles on the project. Very nice gains and the parts arent that much money. You can get the milder cam on sale from the for like 250 I think.
Old 10-03-2004, 03:29 PM
  #3  
lm7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
lm7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Jose , Yay Area
Posts: 1,234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

seems pretty cool, but as for bang for the buck mods the LSX intake is pretty damn expensive for the gains IMO
Old 10-03-2004, 03:56 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
CHAGO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northwest Houston
Posts: 5,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lm7
seems pretty cool, but as for bang for the buck mods the LSX intake is pretty damn expensive for the gains IMO
yup, that and the throttle body are some expensive shiite
Old 10-03-2004, 04:04 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since 99.9% of 5.3 motors are in trucks I wish they would of picked a cam that was more suited for trucks. And you are right that LSX **** if expensive.
Old 10-03-2004, 04:43 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
Sport Side's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

can anyone scan the article?
Old 10-03-2004, 05:45 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
derek_silvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They chose a big cam because they wanted to illustrate the big power potential for relatively low cost.

$3000 dollars put them what.... 170HP over stock.
Old 10-03-2004, 06:08 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hell thats more hp than a s/c sweet!!
Old 10-03-2004, 06:11 PM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
 
GoldenVelvet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fresno/Chico
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Soon we will be able to do the LS2 intake which is much less then the LSX and comparable.

Where was the artical published?
Old 10-03-2004, 08:49 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mefis
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The article was published in the November 2004 issue of Car Craft. Pages 74-77.


Quick Reply: Little Bro' 5.3L project in Car Craft



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:25 PM.