Notices
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

That L92 truck intake is looking pretty good

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2007, 02:28 AM
  #1  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default That L92 truck intake is looking pretty good

Especially ported...

Pics non sponsor link
I think GM did a helluva job on this one. Looks like they fixed some of the LS2 truck intake shortcomings.


If I didn't already have the AFR 225's I'd be hard pressed not to jump on the L92 package wagon for my truck. I'm still thinking about it for my corvette conversion project but with the L76 intake instead.

Last edited by ranwalk; 01-16-2007 at 06:15 AM.
Old 01-16-2007, 05:11 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your porting work looks real good. So who is going to be the first to try this puppy out?
Old 01-16-2007, 08:52 AM
  #3  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd have to leave that up to the customer to name himself.

I was actually just excited to share pics of the manifold because I hadn't even seen pics of one before it arrived at the shop.

Anyway, if you haven't seen one... take a look at one somewhere.
Old 01-16-2007, 10:44 AM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (18)
 
tdrumm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast, NJ
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is the customer a member here?
Old 01-16-2007, 10:56 AM
  #5  
Tin Foil Hat Wearin' Fool
iTrader: (36)
 
1slow01Z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 23,204
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Why cant the pictures be shown. Do they have a website URL in them?
Old 01-16-2007, 01:21 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
SS_bnoon_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I feel a PM storm coming on. PM the link or the pics to me please.
Old 01-16-2007, 04:38 PM
  #7  
RWC
Staging Lane
iTrader: (5)
 
RWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The L92 intake is impressive compared to the original truck manifold. It measures 8 1/2" across at the top, runner to runner, compared to 7" on the original. I can put my whole hand down the throat to the end. The 07 Trailblazer is also much improved over the orig truck and looks like a slightly smaller version of the L92 and it measures 8" across at the runners. It necks down some going back to the end but still not near as small as the orig truck. Both have a much larger plenum area and looks to be very good flow improvements. Have you noticed how the TBSS HP/TQ curves look with a few mods and how high they spin and still look good compared to most trucks that peak well before 6000. It would be nice to see back to back tests to know just how good.

Ron
Old 01-16-2007, 06:40 PM
  #8  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
86MC_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RWC
The L92 intake is impressive compared to the original truck manifold. It measures 8 1/2" across at the top, runner to runner, compared to 7" on the original. I can put my whole hand down the throat to the end. The 07 Trailblazer is also much improved over the orig truck and looks like a slightly smaller version of the L92 and it measures 8" across at the runners. It necks down some going back to the end but still not near as small as the orig truck. Both have a much larger plenum area and looks to be very good flow improvements. Have you noticed how the TBSS HP/TQ curves look with a few mods and how high they spin and still look good compared to most trucks that peak well before 6000. It would be nice to see back to back tests to know just how good.

Ron
I want to see a comparison between the 3 big uglys.
Old 01-16-2007, 06:44 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
Revolutionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Las Vegas NV, Chicago Il
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

And why is it we can't see pictures?
Old 01-16-2007, 10:34 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
CHarris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Because I have them hosted on the only space I pay for... my own commercial website.

I really believe this could be a great setup for a guy with a turbo or supercharger. No fitment issues or belt/pulley realignment issues like a swap to a FAST or LS6.


Quick Reply: That L92 truck intake is looking pretty good



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM.