GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

l92 to a 429 power??

Old Apr 4, 2010 | 10:07 PM
  #31  
abcdefg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

o ok well thats good that i wont have to worry bout overheating
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 10:36 PM
  #32  
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 13
From: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by abcdefg
yea it is alot cheaper but ive also read on alot of places that the elbows cause alot of air restriction..

and yea its runnin ok with the l92 intake but if theres a easy way to get more power just by changin the intake .. then im all for it
This is why I run a Fast 4150 throttle body.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 10:45 PM
  #33  
abcdefg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

just looked it up thats a big money thottle body lol ima have to start savin up for the intake and throttle body lol
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 10:56 PM
  #34  
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 13
From: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by abcdefg
just looked it up thats a big money thottle body lol ima have to start savin up for the intake and throttle body lol
Mine was around 475... you can get on summit and they have bigger throttle bodies even less
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 10:59 PM
  #35  
abcdefg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

thats wut i seen close too 500 and then another 400 for the intake..
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 11:01 PM
  #36  
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 13
From: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by abcdefg
thats wut i seen close too 500 and then another 400 for the intake..
Yep and just the fast intake will cost you that much as both of those together. Its cheaper than the fast, yet I know your wanting to run the l92 intake. It will work but it will be less efficient, something you can always put on later.

Something else to consider is the L76 intake. But I dont know what all is going to be needed to run that as I dont know much about it and going to cable throttle body if thats what you have.

Last edited by dirt track racer 81; Apr 4, 2010 at 11:06 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 11:06 PM
  #37  
abcdefg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

tru but wont i loose a bit of torque with one of these? arnt these mostly for light cars that dont need much torque
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 11:11 PM
  #38  
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 13
From: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by abcdefg
tru but wont i loose a bit of torque with one of these? arnt these mostly for light cars that dont need much torque
l76 or vic jr?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #39  
abcdefg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

VIC JR well when i had asked i asked bout the vic jr and elbow combo.. idk if vic nd tb will loose torque also
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 11:37 PM
  #40  
dirt track racer 81's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,439
Likes: 13
From: Hennessey, Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by abcdefg
VIC JR well when i had asked i asked bout the vic jr and elbow combo.. idk if vic nd tb will loose torque also
i went from ported ls1 heads 226/230 cam and pro-prod 85mm intake to 244/248 cam ls6 heads milled .030 and vic jr with 1375 cfm plate and gained 20 rwtq
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 AM.