L33 vs lq4 for swap?
#11
#12
You're definitely overthinking it. Neither L33 or LQ4 will be overwhelming in a truck with 32" tires and a 3.55 rear unless you're adding a turbo or supercharger. The R/T's 5.9L was rated at 330-345 lb/ft of torque stock, so I'd say that's comparable. But R/Ts also had a 3.92 rear and 30" tires.
I'd probably choose the LQ4 for your setup where weight savings are negligible and it's probably the cheaper of the two. The low end torque from the larger displacement is also welcome given your final drive ratio.
I'd probably choose the LQ4 for your setup where weight savings are negligible and it's probably the cheaper of the two. The low end torque from the larger displacement is also welcome given your final drive ratio.
#13
You're definitely overthinking it. Neither L33 or LQ4 will be overwhelming in a truck with 32" tires and a 3.55 rear unless you're adding a turbo or supercharger. The R/T's 5.9L was rated at 330-345 lb/ft of torque stock, so I'd say that's comparable. But R/Ts also had a 3.92 rear and 30" tires.
I'd probably choose the LQ4 for your setup where weight savings are negligible and it's probably the cheaper of the two. The low end torque from the larger displacement is also welcome given your final drive ratio.
I'd probably choose the LQ4 for your setup where weight savings are negligible and it's probably the cheaper of the two. The low end torque from the larger displacement is also welcome given your final drive ratio.
Thanks again for all the help guys.
#14
If youre worried about torque go with a larger cam

"I'm worried I make too much torque" - said no stock cube LS swap EVER.
Make ALL the power you can and worry about traction later... you always have your right foot for that.

"I'm worried I make too much torque" - said no stock cube LS swap EVER.
Make ALL the power you can and worry about traction later... you always have your right foot for that.
#15
torque does no good if you have to play with the throttle to keep from spinning. Congrats, that means you wasted your money. In not looking for an all out build. But thanks for your .02 any ways?
#17
The kind of sad thing is, once all this gets done, ill have around double the horse power and double the torque them I have now, and still get a lot better fuel mileage. Thats having my cake and gorging myself on it too. Lol. Mopar didn't put a lot of effort in their magnum engines...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mconway68w
GM Parts Classifieds
4
Jun 26, 2011 06:47 AM
gjohnson
Tuning, Diagnostics, Electronics, and Wiring
1
Dec 16, 2009 08:22 PM




