intake fit questions after head work.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 23, 2006 | 07:28 PM

#11

02sierraz71_5.3

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 3,473

Likes: 1

From: Cornelius, NC

Oh and compression is more reliable than boost you dont have to deal with excessive IAT's you just need good tuning and 93 octane

Mar 23, 2006 | 07:51 PM

#12

Flyer

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jan 2003

Posts: 9,342

Likes: 0

From: Armpit of East TX

I wouldn't be against 12:1, it needs more compression.

Without knowing a whole lot on the subject though, 60 sounds like a lot of material.

Mar 24, 2006 | 07:59 AM

#13

KBOBOZ71

Thread Starter

TECH Resident

iTrader: (36)

Joined: Feb 2005

Posts: 761

Likes: 0

From: Texarkana, AR

well i dont know quite how much i am willing to go yet but i guess we'll see.

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

1986 Turbo K5 16K

5.3Okasai

Trucks and SUV Classifieds

Mar 9, 2022 01:07 PM

Finalizing build

The_W

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Oct 28, 2015 09:00 PM

Help with LQ4 swap in 91 Z71 RCSB

GrooveCityZ71

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

Aug 31, 2015 12:05 PM

New from michigan

Ammadien

New Members

Jul 22, 2015 08:50 PM

NNBS intake, 862 heads

fat tony157

GM Parts Classifieds

Jul 16, 2015 12:35 PM