intake fit questions after head work.

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-23-2006, 07:28 PM

#11

02sierraz71_5.3

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (2)

Join Date: Oct 2004

Location: Cornelius, NC

Posts: 3,473

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Oh and compression is more reliable than boost you dont have to deal with excessive IAT's you just need good tuning and 93 octane

Reply Like

03-23-2006, 07:51 PM

#12

Flyer

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jan 2003

Location: Armpit of East TX

Posts: 9,342

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

I wouldn't be against 12:1, it needs more compression.

Without knowing a whole lot on the subject though, 60 sounds like a lot of material.

Reply Like

03-24-2006, 07:59 AM

#13

KBOBOZ71

TECH Resident

Thread Starter

iTrader: (36)

Join Date: Feb 2005

Location: Texarkana, AR

Posts: 761

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

well i dont know quite how much i am willing to go yet but i guess we'll see.

Reply Like

Reply Subscribe

Related Topics

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

1986 Turbo K5 16K

5.3Okasai

Trucks and SUV Classifieds

03-09-2022 01:07 PM

Finalizing build

The_W

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

10-28-2015 09:00 PM

Help with LQ4 swap in 91 Z71 RCSB

GrooveCityZ71

GM Engine & Exhaust Performance

08-31-2015 12:05 PM

New from michigan

Ammadien

New Members

07-22-2015 08:50 PM

NNBS intake, 862 heads

fat tony157

GM Parts Classifieds

07-16-2015 12:35 PM