GM Engine & Exhaust Performance EFI | GEN I/GEN II/GEN III/GEN IV Engines |Small Block | Big Block |

how would a 6.0 run w/ 862's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #21  
lo&sloSierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

i dont know why you would drop the exhaust valve size, i thought exhaust was 2" stock in the 862 heads, help me understand this, i dont know much with this stuff so enlighten me
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:57 PM
  #22  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

intake is 1.89" and exhaust is about 1.55" I think. LS1 and 6.0 use 2" intake and 1.6" exhaust I think.

I'm still not sold on putting stock 5.3 heads on a 6.0 with just bigger valves. GM developed the 317s for a reason. They flow more and will make more power. The only reason I can see putting on 5.3s is for cost since you can get them almost for free.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:59 PM
  #23  
lo&sloSierra's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

thanks gmctrk
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #24  
GMCtrk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,275
Likes: 19
From: Dallas
Default

I wouldn't mind using some ported 5.3s my self, problem is the fact that I have the lq9. Compression would be far too high. I really think a 68cc chamber would be ideal for me. Bring compression somewhere around 10.5-10.6
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ferrellrooster
GM Drivetrain & Suspension
7
Mar 6, 2025 03:22 PM
Dan Neumann
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
11
Aug 7, 2022 09:06 AM
stealthperf
General Truck Racing and Discussion
34
Feb 14, 2016 11:35 AM
steves86ta
GM Engine & Exhaust Performance
5
Jul 28, 2015 10:21 AM
fat tony157
GM Parts Classifieds
6
Jul 16, 2015 12:35 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.